IETF Logo Mail Archive

[manet-dlep-rg] Latency

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Mon, 11 November 2013 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F5121E8090 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:15:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jxeR37VgmBnT for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:15:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f180.google.com (mail-ea0-f180.google.com [209.85.215.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9197911E818C for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:15:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b11so2905504eae.11 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:15:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=ADgHeC1zZ7HPsCLaTux5LKC+GkeMg4IrrpYnFD6uJXk=; b=PehJww/N9z+7n8ifVEObf6hB0/TGXQEXV6CjEGQA0a7HKMdOhOkV6llhvUwsGKh/LU H28wRZWHaGQeqrCQeAKMCz/YQhlcWE+muzRNaDI1kaGJSyxSC4GV7YVyxjQf8xAWJHfq LpdEz3BkBTD5RVwGVqIZd8f81W2E4MoP8fBPfLmCD4gShI9excK2q0/APNjX02gnwI9M zW+/hFAmmCovviU0EqmtpZgbtAGZaSlMasEJzZ5rxjll7x+GpgdP74LsaUiimgChYCvN bzqYCxxk6nAts670V4hQ3szVCz7rRWMdkr4WGKmA3xujhn/s+Yv830QQ+a8pEkh8LlbV /Lzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlVzvsRuIXuv+QY7Gc/i6Wv3TpRKPdkkEHRZ/4xQysKg6a6hfoUHy+Dh6oWLRMH7QD4aiUQ
X-Received: by 10.15.49.6 with SMTP id i6mr592083eew.109.1384186528667; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:15:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.175.173.95] (524A14A4.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [82.74.20.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y7sm64588097eea.5.2013.11.11.08.15.27 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:15:26 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <032D6BF0-5B60-489D-8BC5-9634BEDDBC9F@inf-net.nl>
References: <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9192F7@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <CAK=bVC85XAXR3Zkwq+JwELF-dvgrKwbowWCvwvnjeVn7VStnbw@mail.gmail.com> <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9193CD@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <5A8A5085482DA84995F4E70F5093AB50268E6C@XCH-BLV-503.nw.nos.boeing.com> <B2BA430A-F4E6-4DED-A7BB-7282A22802B7@inf-net.nl> <D02397F1-9D1B-4B36-81D0-4585ACDBA34A@gmail.com> <5D184300-2D97-4EC1-8D91-76D4A79B2BDA@inf-net.nl> <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com>
To: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: "DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org)" <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
Subject: [manet-dlep-rg] Latency
X-BeenThere: manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DLEP Radio Group <manet-dlep-rg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet-dlep-rg>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:15:39 -0000

Op 11 nov. 2013, om 01:55 heeft Stan Ratliff (sratliff) <sratliff@cisco.com> het volgende geschreven:

> Point 11 - I didn't hear that. Really, I didn't hear any conclusions about Latency. Other opinions? 

We discussed it and all speakers said it is an important metric, so it will be an optional TLV in core document.

Wasn't Henning tasked with verifying Latency and EFT?

Teco

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email