IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet-dlep-rg] DLEP session establishment

"Stan Ratliff (sratliff)" <sratliff@cisco.com> Wed, 13 November 2013 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EF621F9CA4 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:29:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pgwd0v47GLxe for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:29:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A3521F9C6C for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:28:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1049; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384356521; x=1385566121; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=++y0fbFvruNEd6/Oa8+Fod165dwipPXxoFufySx3SHQ=; b=D5PGYgm/pHFfzOLu+XxhA1PaBhgmOhw9yaoA5Ev/n78NVIXj5xgce5aP BSnB8BolFZEEuYLCWb6gxzbzggJypAHH9SUaLkrGHtG6/0DwSMVqtdgXd DOZEFNlI7busaLUWGuXMkoUDcOLUNHOzryBikw2hsjWXs7oDj5Xle0n0I Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFABqag1KtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABagwc4U78pgSEWdIIlAQEBAwF5EAIBCEYyJQIEDgWHewbAIo4hgQszB4MggREDmBCSC4MogWlB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,693,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="284366712"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2013 15:28:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rADFSdlj028300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:28:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.200]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:28:39 -0600
From: "Stan Ratliff (sratliff)" <sratliff@cisco.com>
To: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
Thread-Topic: [manet-dlep-rg] DLEP session establishment
Thread-Index: AQHO3vtV9M2H7YHOwk6IdPrWTJ8AQpohiJSAgACScwCAAAVSAIAACbyAgAD8AoCAAIqXgA==
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:28:38 +0000
Message-ID: <D0000F47-371C-408F-A888-43987C399C01@cisco.com>
References: <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9192F7@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <CAK=bVC85XAXR3Zkwq+JwELF-dvgrKwbowWCvwvnjeVn7VStnbw@mail.gmail.com> <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9193CD@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <5A8A5085482DA84995F4E70F5093AB50268E6C@XCH-BLV-503.nw.nos.boeing.com> <B2BA430A-F4E6-4DED-A7BB-7282A22802B7@inf-net.nl> <D02397F1-9D1B-4B36-81D0-4585ACDBA34A@gmail.com> <5D184300-2D97-4EC1-8D91-76D4A79B2BDA@inf-net.nl> <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com> <0541163b-2d1c-4afd-ad06-ba9a25744310@SUCNPTEXC01.COM.AD.UK.DS.CORP> <B177F831FB91F242972D0C35F6A0733106FB0425@SUCNPTEXM01.com.ad.uk.ds.corp> <14B5C326-6499-439D-BC23-BB39A376825C@cisco.com> <CAGnRvuoxD_dxdoD_8qbHhq--6AF=2B7wNFEE5Xz=vKNwnBhhZw@mail.gmail.com> <9EB171E6-62E6-4136-BFDB-6FEB8DF23B74@cisco.com> <5DD79C5E-7CE0-4E01-A602-097D1629A5C4@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <5DD79C5E-7CE0-4E01-A602-097D1629A5C4@inf-net.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.102.41.107]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <DD741E94B0AE8142BA576E539249F1F1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>, "DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org)" <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>, "Taylor, Rick" <Rick.Taylor@cassidian.com>
Subject: Re: [manet-dlep-rg] DLEP session establishment
X-BeenThere: manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DLEP Radio Group <manet-dlep-rg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet-dlep-rg>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:29:16 -0000

On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> wrote:

>> 
>> I'm also going to MILCOM next week; I'll be working with some of the guys from Persistent Systems (radio vendor; they have a DLEP implementation). I'll ask them about the TCP server vs. client issue, and report back to the DT. 
> 
> If they have some objections, can you ask difference between complexity of implementing a simple DLEP TCP server and for example a HTTPS or DHCP server?
> 
> Their quad radio router has multiple ethernet ports, can you ask why they would prefer a limit, to connect only a single router?

Taking on the role of a TCP client doesn't have anything to do with connecting to multiple routers. If it did, then I would have argued that the router MUST be the TCP server, as it MUST have the capability of connecting to multiple radios….

Stan


> 
> Maybe they should join our DT, I know them as smart guys. Anyway, say hello to them from the Netherlands. I wish them well. 
> 
> Teco

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email