[manet-dlep-rg] DLEP session establishment

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Mon, 11 November 2013 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8D221E8134 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:29:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L2jnvPfgEK36 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f170.google.com (mail-ea0-f170.google.com [209.85.215.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E998821E81F9 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:29:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f170.google.com with SMTP id q10so2340386eaj.15 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:29:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=6iohtAcZ7nYKQSoZNRot1qurHm5ogzNmlDQ3HVTKrYg=; b=KAkhkCUy5489q5cNvpBgXFt739TfyNGWp3rhspG+ZPkGFJFW4e6Xau7Y5XMgM5sYPc DpM6yviW/2k+vaWPPH3h1cS49VysSiF3/QgF0x258jSk4SHQ/1KGeCwn4gSfnuhhCeXC puJtYidTBZOnL+6S5k+h3OMrSwX/adG4etNOiPbmaS373RqJvO2r6wBMYYhWQymmASoU VcNWu5klO+VhZwTUgcGT3GMYV0eLtHM55rDBNTGba84FOHSGD/spYoat1A8E4BweMDtS 6AxP0auXzti9KX3lwBLjalWugEXdg6VHicrCJQkMeEbLxH3TY6KYFP6z8+QNgSzwQ7OB KiWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkY5XdovUa+3C2DTBrRYPPs/gbvuXQ8lBjhOFaYL/cHid9MN6S0Yv35Jb9bYTxhN4KxQJif
X-Received: by 10.14.100.65 with SMTP id y41mr27658eef.143.1384187354059; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:29:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.175.173.95] (524A14A4.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [82.74.20.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z2sm64723033eee.7.2013.11.11.08.29.12 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:29:13 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:29:11 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F7A59094-AFD9-4534-B00A-A464769998A7@inf-net.nl>
References: <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9192F7@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <CAK=bVC85XAXR3Zkwq+JwELF-dvgrKwbowWCvwvnjeVn7VStnbw@mail.gmail.com> <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9193CD@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <5A8A5085482DA84995F4E70F5093AB50268E6C@XCH-BLV-503.nw.nos.boeing.com> <B2BA430A-F4E6-4DED-A7BB-7282A22802B7@inf-net.nl> <D02397F1-9D1B-4B36-81D0-4585ACDBA34A@gmail.com> <5D184300-2D97-4EC1-8D91-76D4A79B2BDA@inf-net.nl> <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com>
To: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: "DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org)" <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
Subject: [manet-dlep-rg] DLEP session establishment
X-BeenThere: manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DLEP Radio Group <manet-dlep-rg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet-dlep-rg>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:29:25 -0000

Op 11 nov. 2013, om 01:55 heeft Stan Ratliff (sratliff) <sratliff@cisco.com> het volgende geschreven:

> Also, as to the Discovery: Here's what I'm writing up as we speak: 
> 
> 
> Router                                                                 Modem
> ========================================
>                                     <------------------------ Peer Discovery Message
> Peer Offer with           ------------------------->
> unicast IP addr/
> port for TCP connect

So this is multicast reply, telling modem to connect?
Why not TCP connect from router to modem? Makes more sense to me, the modem is the peer offering a service.
Maybe add a TcpPort TLV in the Peer Discovery, this allows other than IANA assigned ports.


> 
>  *Connect on TCP socket. Router has issued TCP "listen", 
>    modem issues TCP "connect" (e.g. Modem is the TCP "client",
>    router is the TCP "server")
> 
> Now, The modem's UDP socket can be closed.

Please don't.


> Over the TCP 
> Socket, 
>                                    <------------------------- Peer Initialization containing
>                                                                         TLVs/default values for ALL 
>                                                                         supported metric values - all 
>                                                                         meaning the MANDATORY ones, 
>                                                                         plus any optional metrics (right now, 
>                                                                         just Resources) that are supported. 

Yes, here the full set TLV exchange takes place. This should not be in the Peer Discovery. That's why I suggested to put this in the Peer Offer.


> 
> Peer Initialization ACK ---------------------->
> MAY contain optional 
> Layer 3 (address) TLVs

I'm fine with three way handshake, not with this two way. Or use TCP disconnect when modem modem is not willing to accept first message from router.

Teco

> 
> …. And, everything from there is basically the same as before.