[manet-dlep-rg] Multicast in dlep-04

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Mon, 11 November 2013 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203BA21E8204 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:52:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VpdhyEe5R8sW for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:52:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f181.google.com (mail-ea0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52C521E81F1 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:52:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q10so460725ead.26 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:52:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=l5WqQsMu0ol5Gbt/ExRMYG/2hRX2wONu5P/tjE1NS0s=; b=iQ+QYV0juiwbqx8gSbGZOV7ALxIYSUOvS6XYrt+ymONfwganddoaKJvz40SmVdLEX0 +d+pcwIK0rJYDWrko0BueJQ3a2vSgx+IkqCVqJMepiqPRUUMnwhEF8KHQTuNRTvrS2a5 S7roRFG9TkA+XTIx9pjyXlJObCsa1o9m9DylRxCoO9sQ1GeNixXuTVKhPIcyBTRdkavZ Fc8tcEBPrcTxMY4tRzmdWrqKg/JzotzgUGPDW2J2cvkeKOMceSAqx1tm/gXjptYAw2PB XFnpef7rFpuvVq52u3LgaIlBINLVbnOJNcRZuByE/FqsEYBCA6jI02zYI19gbBg2vFLR cjXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLanvdCs3+cksMxBRypkckcSCirZ2+G8h3RGfYycB1rklNUEI0Tn+LQCf8HHa1c2s2i4zM
X-Received: by 10.15.74.197 with SMTP id j45mr35654045eey.40.1384188765960; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.175.173.95] (524A14A4.cm-4-3a.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [82.74.20.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i1sm64984288eeg.0.2013.11.11.08.52.45 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <6ACE0F8E-1BC5-48B4-A8D0-7C092C6B422D@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:52:43 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D5069667-68A2-4ED8-BB45-73ACB304844B@inf-net.nl>
References: <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9192F7@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <CAK=bVC85XAXR3Zkwq+JwELF-dvgrKwbowWCvwvnjeVn7VStnbw@mail.gmail.com> <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9193CD@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <5A8A5085482DA84995F4E70F5093AB50268E6C@XCH-BLV-503.nw.nos.boeing.com> <B2BA430A-F4E6-4DED-A7BB-7282A22802B7@inf-net.nl> <D02397F1-9D1B-4B36-81D0-4585ACDBA34A@gmail.com> <5D184300-2D97-4EC1-8D91-76D4A79B2BDA@inf-net.nl> <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com> <6ACE0F8E-1BC5-48B4-A8D0-7C092C6B422D@cisco.com>
To: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: "DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org)" <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
Subject: [manet-dlep-rg] Multicast in dlep-04
X-BeenThere: manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DLEP Radio Group <manet-dlep-rg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet-dlep-rg>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:52:53 -0000

Op 11 nov. 2013, om 02:26 heeft Stan Ratliff (sratliff) <sratliff@cisco.com> het volgende geschreven:

> Oh, one more "By the way" - 
> 
> The stuff on "logical destinations in the network" (the multicast explanation) was *already in DLEP 04*. In the "Introduction" section, towards the bottom. Specifically: 
> 
>  "Multicast traffic is handled in IP networks by deriving a Layer 2 MAC
>   address based on the Layer 3 address. Leveraging on this scheme,
>   Multicast traffic is supported in DLEP simply by treating the derived
>   MAC address as any other destination in the network. To support these
>   logical destinations, one of the DLEP participants (typically, the
>   router) informs the other as to the existence of the logical
>   neighbor. The modem, once it is aware of the existence of this
>   logical neighbor, reports link characteristics just as it would for
>   any other destination in the network. The specific algorithms a modem
>   would use to report metrics on multicast (or logical) destinations is
>   outside the scope of this specification, and is left to specific
>   implementations to decide."
> 
> I'm kind of surprised everyone was surprised….. or is the above explanation really obtuse?

This texts perfectly states why to take it out of the core document. We need to get more info on how multicast is handled and thereafter define the DLEP extensions for it.

Teco