Re: [manet-dlep-rg] Latency

Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com> Tue, 12 November 2013 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D6821E827A for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.665
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.665 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.287, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_18=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r9maUMJDW-Fy for <manet-dlep-rg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qe0-x231.google.com (mail-qe0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB9521E8281 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qe0-f49.google.com with SMTP id i11so1224075qej.8 for <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+PZGMThKUTQGxHQDUog2aLHqzMVnlUa5YQ+LsSwmpFw=; b=IKf3myi40DkYHeWrb+MF5EE83GEX0Frg6EP0BHxW0X7s/vSfPex3O1ikOGDWab2zRl xtUjv8wVjI9TpTsCt82WBDOVn8Y3CZTc2oSbFTomqiRYsGG44Td4ChnUCCcuWubj3LKD 3obl5OvSGBqQS5dL4powHNUmJjYN2/xv7/dSnELvq4Fqdy2SXoioubI2RRCvAXP9Jc5D opOY/mpdVnKrh1v60AoR5I26aeMFzkpAyk5cp2+78HodNgHsSLG8J6+HlTKRq085ffIw hKRwVDgdaA/K3X8KjSgEzs/Pq5FcM25/8WsgO9gMeQ7qCDGgAqsDkHnf1swUBGJ0kKVe vrsw==
X-Received: by 10.224.171.196 with SMTP id i4mr59802726qaz.38.1384271965385; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.36.200 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B177F831FB91F242972D0C35F6A0733106FB05E6@SUCNPTEXM01.com.ad.uk.ds.corp>
References: <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9192F7@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <CAK=bVC85XAXR3Zkwq+JwELF-dvgrKwbowWCvwvnjeVn7VStnbw@mail.gmail.com> <72FB622921C13746AD6349E70A8D9F307D9193CD@EXC-MBX03.tsn.tno.nl> <5A8A5085482DA84995F4E70F5093AB50268E6C@XCH-BLV-503.nw.nos.boeing.com> <B2BA430A-F4E6-4DED-A7BB-7282A22802B7@inf-net.nl> <D02397F1-9D1B-4B36-81D0-4585ACDBA34A@gmail.com> <5D184300-2D97-4EC1-8D91-76D4A79B2BDA@inf-net.nl> <DDAE98C5-520E-4F8F-9F9B-2AB9A15A70EF@cisco.com> <032D6BF0-5B60-489D-8BC5-9634BEDDBC9F@inf-net.nl> <aa4dd517-7f86-4caf-8a1c-298cf8200c06@SUCNPTEXC01.COM.AD.UK.DS.CORP> <B177F831FB91F242972D0C35F6A0733106FB04EB@SUCNPTEXM01.com.ad.uk.ds.corp> <CAGnRvuqG20tTHEW3GnVRULo1AA9yNvqU5F_tfYZ-6hDcauuELw@mail.gmail.com> <71c915d2-7fde-48e6-a5ba-e9a960f7b1dc@SUCNPTEXC01.COM.AD.UK.DS.CORP> <B177F831FB91F242972D0C35F6A0733106FB05E6@SUCNPTEXM01.com.ad.uk.ds.corp>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:59:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuoExsX60dYS0KGJocvuVXiSr6O=LKPwgfBmLfXcG22qbg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Taylor, Rick" <Rick.Taylor@cassidian.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org)" <manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>, Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>, "Stan Ratliff (sratliff)" <sratliff@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [manet-dlep-rg] Latency
X-BeenThere: manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DLEP Radio Group <manet-dlep-rg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet-dlep-rg>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg>, <mailto:manet-dlep-rg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:59:28 -0000

32 Bit and "milliseconds" would be a little bit much I think...

I was thinking about 32 Bit MICROseconds... would still allow for a
delay of more than one hour.

Henning Rogge

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Taylor, Rick <Rick.Taylor@cassidian.com> wrote:
> 32 bit ms sounds good to me.
>
> I wasn't suggesting X*hopcount was a good way of reporting latency, I was just giving you insight into a personal hack ;)
>
> I think there is a general rule that should be covered by the 'Best Effort' statement:  In a multi-hop mesh, the metrics must reflect the fact it is multi-hop in a 'Best Effort' way.  That includes Latency, which I would consider a cumulative metric.
>
> Rick Taylor
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: manet-dlep-rg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:manet-dlep-rg-
>> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stan Ratliff (sratliff)
>> Sent: 12 November 2013 15:34
>> To: Henning Rogge
>> Cc: DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org); Teco Boot; Taylor, Rick
>> Subject: Re: [manet-dlep-rg] Latency
>>
>>
>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > How much resolution do we need?
>> >
>> > It milliseconds enough, or do we need to do better? Maybe 32 bit
>> > integer in microseconds? That would give us enough precision but also
>> > allows for high-delay radios.
>> >
>> > *looking at Stan's reply* rolling latency sounds reasonable, so its
>> > similar to the "control package RTT" Rick Taylor told us about?
>> >
>> > So we are looking for a value that means "rough estimate of the time
>> > between IP packet got delivered to radio and IP packet leaves other
>> > radio" ?
>>
>> That sounds right to me.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stan
>>
>> >
>> > Henning Rogge
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Taylor, Rick
>> <Rick.Taylor@cassidian.com> wrote:
>> >> From my experience:
>> >>
>> >> My test DLEP devices just make up a number (not very helpful)
>> >>
>> >> The radios I have used that support DLEP-00 natively report a latency
>> in ms.  What that really is I have no idea.  Again, not very useful.
>> >>
>> >> I have my own DLEP proxy for some other radios, and I have just
>> reported half of RTT on my control packets, which given I have jitter and
>> back-off, again isn't very useful.
>> >>
>> >> BUT, Having a latency metric, even if it is almost meaningless, is
>> better than no metric at all.
>> >>
>> >> I could suggest 100ms * hop-count works in mesh radios, as one of the
>> simplest uses of latency is as an improved hopcount for split-horizoning
>> in routing protocols.
>> >>
>> >> It's amazing what one will try to use, even if the quality of the data
>> is very poor!
>> >>
>> >> Rick Taylor
>> >>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: manet-dlep-rg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:manet-dlep-rg-
>> >>> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henning Rogge
>> >>> Sent: 12 November 2013 13:23
>> >>> To: Teco Boot
>> >>> Cc: DLEP Research Group (manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org); Stan Ratliff
>> >>> Subject: Re: [manet-dlep-rg] Latency
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, I heard this too in the MANET Meeting...
>> >>>
>> >>> which made me wonder a bit because I was puzzled what was the
>> >>> difference between the two.
>> >>>
>> >>> Can maybe the people who already have an implementation for DLEP tell
>> >>> us what kind of Latency they implemented?
>> >>>
>> >>> Henning Rogge
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Op 11 nov. 2013, om 01:55 heeft Stan Ratliff (sratliff)
>> >>> <sratliff@cisco.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Point 11 - I didn't hear that. Really, I didn't hear any conclusions
>> >>> about Latency. Other opinions?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We discussed it and all speakers said it is an important metric, so
>> it
>> >>> will be an optional TLV in core document.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Wasn't Henning tasked with verifying Latency and EFT?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Teco
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> manet-dlep-rg mailing list
>> >>>> manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
>> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered
>> >>> long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
>> >>> set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> manet-dlep-rg mailing list
>> >>> manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg
>> >> The information contained within this e-mail and any files attached to
>> this e-mail is private and in addition may include commercially sensitive
>> information. The contents of this e-mail are for the intended recipient
>> only and therefore if you wish to disclose the information contained
>> within this e-mail or attached files, please contact the sender prior to
>> any such disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>> disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited. Please also contact the
>> sender and inform them of the error and delete the e-mail, including any
>> attached files from your system. Cassidian Limited, Registered Office :
>> Quadrant House, Celtic Springs, Coedkernew, Newport, NP10 8FZ Company No:
>> 04191036 http://www.cassidian.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered
>> > long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
>> > set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet-dlep-rg mailing list
>> manet-dlep-rg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dlep-rg
> The information contained within this e-mail and any files attached to this e-mail is private and in addition may include commercially sensitive information. The contents of this e-mail are for the intended recipient only and therefore if you wish to disclose the information contained within this e-mail or attached files, please contact the sender prior to any such disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited. Please also contact the sender and inform them of the error and delete the e-mail, including any attached files from your system. Cassidian Limited, Registered Office : Quadrant House, Celtic Springs, Coedkernew, Newport, NP10 8FZ Company No: 04191036 http://www.cassidian.com



-- 
We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered
long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan