[Manet-dt] Re: [manet] DYMO RREQ flooding and super-flooding

Philippe Jacquet <philippe.jacquet@inria.fr> Wed, 16 May 2007 11:47 UTC

Return-path: <manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoHyl-0003vW-1b; Wed, 16 May 2007 07:47:39 -0400
Received: from manet-dt by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HoHyj-0003vR-W5 for manet-dt-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 07:47:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoHyg-0003uz-Mw; Wed, 16 May 2007 07:47:34 -0400
Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoHyf-0001hh-7y; Wed, 16 May 2007 07:47:34 -0400
Received: from [192.168.112.191] (sphinx.lix.polytechnique.fr [129.104.11.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4GBlVNW022323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 May 2007 13:47:31 +0200
Message-ID: <464AEF53.7020506@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:47:31 +0200
From: Philippe Jacquet <philippe.jacquet@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Chakeres <ian.chakeres@gmail.com>
References: <4649E10A.5040007@inria.fr> <374005f30705152127m6a8bdfe2n99715930e2bd9393@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <374005f30705152127m6a8bdfe2n99715930e2bd9393@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 464AEF53.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)!
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by concorde.inria.fr id l4GBlVNW022323
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b7b9551d71acde901886cc48bfc088a6
Cc: manet <manet@ietf.org>, manet-dt@ietf.org
Subject: [Manet-dt] Re: [manet] DYMO RREQ flooding and super-flooding
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org

Ian, I don't understand how the method you described in your paper for 
AODV can be applied for DYMO.

Assume you delay the RREQ retransmission on the two-hop route because 
the routers have low willingness, so that it is transmitted after the 
three hops route. Anyhow the two-hop RREQ will be relayed since it has a 
smaller hop-count and the shortest route will be in fact selected. Or am 
I wrong?

Philippe

Ian Chakeres a écrit :
> I had done some work on using different metrics by introducing delay
> during route discovery to influence route selection.
> 
> Here is the paper info:
> 
> Ian D. Chakeres and Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer. "Transparent Influence
> of Path Selection in Heterogeneous Ad hoc Networks." Proceedings of
> the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile
> Radio Communications (PIMRC), Barcelona, Spain, September 2004.
> 
> For the base spec we are not including any complex metrics, but
> instead rely on DV & hopcount (if included) or other techniques that
> work under these assumptions (like the paper above).
> 
> I think some additional TLVs and new functionality to enable DYMO to
> support more complex metrics would be interesting.
> 
> Ian
> 
> On 5/15/07, Philippe Jacquet <philippe.jacquet@inria.fr> wrote:
>> Hello, folks,
>>
>> I see in DYMO spec (5.3.4) that a RREQ message can be retransmitted
>> several times by a node if it receives copies on shorter routes.
>>
>> This reminds me the paper we did about this kind of super-flooding.
>>
>> Comparative Study of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
>> T. Clausen, P. Jacquet et L. Viennot
>> Med-hoc-Net, 2002
>>
>>
>> http://gyroweb.inria.fr/~viennot/postscripts/medhocnet2002sim.ps.gz
>>
>> It gives the shortest path to OrigNode in hop count, but the number of
>> retransmissions may be important and exceed the network size (can be
>> quadratic in the network size per RREQ).
>>
>> I wonder if one could also add other metrics than simply hop count. For
>> example RREQ could seek the path with average shortest delay by adding
>> the last hop average link delay to the current weight carried by the
>> RREQ. The RREQ would carry a bit indicating that average shortest delay
>> is activated). Or the RREQ could look to the largest bandwidth route (in
>> this case one take the minimum of the last hop bandwidth with the weight
>> carried by the RREQ.
>>
>> Other metrics are possible (variance, etc).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Manet-dt mailing list
Manet-dt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt