RE: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multicast addresses

"Joe Macker" <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil> Mon, 22 May 2006 13:28 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiAS1-0003Cd-Sg; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:28:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiARN-0002xL-A1 for manet-dt@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:27:21 -0400
Received: from s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil ([132.250.83.3]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiAFD-00080D-8D for manet-dt@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:14:48 -0400
Received: from smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.86.3]) by s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4MDEjib004621; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:14:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from SEXTANT [132.250.92.22]) by smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (SMSSMTP 4.1.12.43) with SMTP id M2006052209144403575 ; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:14:44 -0400
From: "Joe Macker" <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil>
To: "'Maoyu Wang'" <maoyu.wang@crc.ca>
Subject: RE: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multicast addresses
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 09:14:41 -0400
Message-ID: <036d01c67da1$afda16f0$165cfa84@SEXTANT>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
In-Reply-To: <446E2EB6.9010607@crc.ca>
Thread-Index: AcZ7hPthfN8cew/VTH+yKmdzjmsZjwCHDrgw
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org

SMF also supports non=scoped addresses. 
My point was we may need a range for multiple scoped purposes and some may
be TBD (e.g., autoconf). 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Maoyu Wang [mailto:maoyu.wang@crc.ca] 
>Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 4:47 PM
>To: Joe Macker
>Cc: manet-dt@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multicast 
>addresses
>
>A range of scoped addresses are needed since SMF will support 
>different multicast groups.
>Joe Macker wrote:
>
>>Well since we put such a notion in the SMF draft I am a fan. 
>>I don't believe it needs to be one address. It could be a range of 
>>administratively scoped addresses.
>>
>>  
>>
>Maoyu Wang
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Network Systems Communications 
>Research Centre, Industry Canada Government of Canada
>
>



_______________________________________________
Manet-dt mailing list
Manet-dt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt