RE: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multicast addresses
"Joe Macker" <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil> Mon, 22 May 2006 13:28 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1FiAS1-0003Cd-Sg; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:28:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiARN-0002xL-A1
for manet-dt@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:27:21 -0400
Received: from s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil ([132.250.83.3])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiAFD-00080D-8D
for manet-dt@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:14:48 -0400
Received: from smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.86.3])
by s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4MDEjib004621;
Mon, 22 May 2006 09:14:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from SEXTANT [132.250.92.22])
by smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (SMSSMTP 4.1.12.43) with SMTP id
M2006052209144403575 ; Mon, 22 May 2006 09:14:44 -0400
From: "Joe Macker" <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil>
To: "'Maoyu Wang'" <maoyu.wang@crc.ca>
Subject: RE: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multicast addresses
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 09:14:41 -0400
Message-ID: <036d01c67da1$afda16f0$165cfa84@SEXTANT>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
In-Reply-To: <446E2EB6.9010607@crc.ca>
Thread-Index: AcZ7hPthfN8cew/VTH+yKmdzjmsZjwCHDrgw
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>,
<mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>,
<mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org
SMF also supports non=scoped addresses. My point was we may need a range for multiple scoped purposes and some may be TBD (e.g., autoconf). >-----Original Message----- >From: Maoyu Wang [mailto:maoyu.wang@crc.ca] >Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 4:47 PM >To: Joe Macker >Cc: manet-dt@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multicast >addresses > >A range of scoped addresses are needed since SMF will support >different multicast groups. >Joe Macker wrote: > >>Well since we put such a notion in the SMF draft I am a fan. >>I don't believe it needs to be one address. It could be a range of >>administratively scoped addresses. >> >> >> >Maoyu Wang > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Network Systems Communications >Research Centre, Industry Canada Government of Canada > > _______________________________________________ Manet-dt mailing list Manet-dt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt
- [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multicast… Ian Chakeres
- RE: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multi… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multi… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multi… Ian Chakeres
- RE: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multi… Joe Macker
- Re: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multi… Maoyu Wang
- Re: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multi… Ian Chakeres
- Re: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multi… Charles E. Perkins
- RE: [Manet-dt] Revivied discussion on MANET multi… Joe Macker