[Manet-dt] PacketBB Packet/Message TLV Type - MANET ID?
"Ian Chakeres" <ian.chakeres@gmail.com> Mon, 25 September 2006 02:54 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1GRgcC-00010G-Ow; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:54:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRgcB-00010B-IN
for manet-dt@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:54:39 -0400
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRgc1-0002a0-N7
for manet-dt@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:54:39 -0400
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 72so393005ugd
for <manet-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=M/eagJRpjKyZ0XTpjZWa5+4zfJUDM97r/WTdAla1x1EdqgTC+AI36uNAuauBh8gosctxGGBNdRpyGNpf20OV6+UHGPkJCA53wsCQP0u8trqmKTOulX4Q8DXe+Apa65woesFvUNJr3+6q7EKFGFVLIse1y/2lYcTaIkFCDvAuCPk=
Received: by 10.67.93.6 with SMTP id v6mr2968897ugl;
Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.224.14 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <374005f30609241954q4cf6e579ra8f71977c975911c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:54:28 -0700
From: "Ian Chakeres" <ian.chakeres@gmail.com>
To: manet-dt@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Subject: [Manet-dt] PacketBB Packet/Message TLV Type - MANET ID?
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>,
<mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>,
<mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org
In MANET there are certain deployments that might want to operate several separate MANETs using the same wireless channel. Should PacketBB include a Packet/Message TLV identifying the MANET ID? These TLVs would indicate to receiving nodes that the particular packet/message is associated with a particular configured MANET ID. This field would be used like OSPF area or instance ID to separate routing regions though they might use the same links/medium. Do you think we should include this in the PacketBB spec or should it live elsewhere? Perhaps we should pull out "common" packet BB types (PREFIX_LENGTH, etc) into a separate document. Ian Chakeres _______________________________________________ Manet-dt mailing list Manet-dt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt
- [Manet-dt] PacketBB Packet/Message TLV Type - MAN… Ian Chakeres
- RE: [Manet-dt] PacketBB Packet/Message TLV Type -… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)