RE: [Manet-dt] PacketBB IANA Registry Private Use Space

> PacketBB authors, is there a reason behind allocating half the type
> space to private use?

Two parts to that. First, I think that it's clear we need some private
use type space, that's pretty universal with such things.

Second, why half? First, it's convenient, and I don't think we're
the first to suggest such a split. Second, with a protocol specific
and general split I think we have enough space to permit this. But
it's not fundamental.

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Manet-dt mailing list
Manet-dt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt