[Manet-dt] Possible Group Pow-wow Monday Afternoon or Evening.
"Joe Macker" <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil> Thu, 02 March 2006 00:28 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1FEbg3-0001FZ-OV; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:28:19 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEbg2-0001FU-C2
for manet-dt@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:28:18 -0500
Received: from s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil ([132.250.83.3])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEbg0-0008Va-3U
for manet-dt@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:28:18 -0500
Received: from smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.86.3])
by s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8) with SMTP id k220SFOD002071
for <manet-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:28:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from SEXTANT [132.250.92.22])
by smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (SMSSMTP 4.1.11.41) with SMTP id
M2006030119281528551
for <manet-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:28:15 -0500
From: "Joe Macker" <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil>
To: <manet-dt@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:28:12 -0500
Message-ID: <000001c63d90$309cb880$165cfa84@SEXTANT>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <374005f30602010811v32b42675q77fbe5aed2f134f4@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-Index: AcYnSnAxNqGZuBsETLuXii7+ZDBScwWQ782g
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Subject: [Manet-dt] Possible Group Pow-wow Monday Afternoon or Evening.
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>,
<mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>,
<mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org
I would like to sit down with manet design team participants prior to MANET on Tuesday. Any interest in sometime Monday afternoon or evening? - I may not arrive until Monday but will likely stay through Thrusday for autoconf. Ian and I will likely provide a brief RTG area report. There are several RTG area sessions so its hard to predict right which one. I want to plant the seed on peoples calendars early. -Joe >-----Original Message----- >From: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org >[mailto:manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ian Chakeres >Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 11:12 AM >To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK) >Cc: manet-dt@ietf.org; Thomas Clausen >Subject: Re: [Manet-dt] Generalised OLSR packet/message format >comments -msg-semantics > >My opinion is that several msg-types might have benefit from >using a few bits in the fixed portion for their specific use. >I don't think this goes against the common format philosophy. >Perhaps, the msg-semantics could be broken into 4 bits for >msg-semantics and 4 bits for msg-type-specific bits. > >I am just proposing the idea. Would any of the OLSRv2 packets >benefit from having a few bits specific and available to it? > >Ian > >On 2/1/06, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) ><chris.dearlove@baesystems.com> wrote: >> >> > One last comment. I would like to see several of the msg-semantic >> > bits reserved for msg-type specific bits. 4 ideally, but I would >> > probably settle for 2. For example in DYMO, RREQ messages >could use >> > a few of these bits for its own purpose. >> >> I think this is exactly contrary to the common format >philosophy (see >> my last message) and is not a good idea. If an RREQ needs RREQ >> specific information, the place for that is a message TLV. >> >> >> ******************************************************************** >> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended >> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. >> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or >> distribute its contents to any other person. >> ******************************************************************** >> > >_______________________________________________ >Manet-dt mailing list >Manet-dt@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt > _______________________________________________ Manet-dt mailing list Manet-dt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt
- Re: [Manet-dt] Generalised OLSR packet/message fo… Ian Chakeres
- RE: [Manet-dt] Generalised OLSR packet/message fo… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- RE: [Manet-dt] Generalised OLSR packet/message fo… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [Manet-dt] Generalised OLSR packet/message fo… Ian Chakeres
- [Manet-dt] Possible Group Pow-wow Monday Afternoo… Joe Macker
- Re: [Manet-dt] Possible Group Pow-wow Monday Afte… Ian Chakeres
- Re: [Manet-dt] Possible Group Pow-wow Monday Afte… Pedro M. Ruiz
- RE: [Manet-dt] Possible Group Pow-wow Monday Afte… Joe Macker