IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Manet-dt] IANA Port & Multicast Addresses

"Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com> Thu, 29 June 2006 09:06 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvsU3-0003zi-0b; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:06:47 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvsU1-0003vT-4g for manet-dt@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:06:45 -0400
Received: from smtp1.bae.co.uk ([20.133.0.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvsTu-0008TK-0v for manet-dt@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:06:45 -0400
Received: from ngbaux (ngbaux.msd.bae.co.uk [141.245.68.234]) by smtp1.bae.co.uk (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id k5T96QL25333 for <manet-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:06:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from glkas0002.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.52]) by ngbaux.net.bae.co.uk (PMDF V5.2-33 #44998) with ESMTP id <0J1M0066W6MI9V@ngbaux.net.bae.co.uk> for manet-dt@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:06:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from glkms0002.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.2]) by glkas0002.GREENLNK.NET with InterScan Message Security Suite; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:01:21 +0100
Received: from glkms0008.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.8]) by glkms0002.GREENLNK.NET with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:01:19 +0100
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:01:18 +0100
From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>
Subject: RE: [Manet-dt] IANA Port & Multicast Addresses
To: Ian Chakeres <ian.chakeres@gmail.com>, manet-dt@ietf.org
Message-id: <C1DE3C7469FE5A4D95F9BF0F332D8B8D02263FDB@glkms0008>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6556.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Topic: [Manet-dt] IANA Port & Multicast Addresses
Thread-Index: AcabS23TcWp4K/AiQTi9vmew28NkMgACbDQgAAEc73A=
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2006 09:01:19.0802 (UTC) FILETIME=[9652F9A0:01C69B5A]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc:
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org

> Second, what's wanted by NHDP/OLSRv2 and I would
> have thought by DYMO (but maybe I'm wrong) is all
> MANET neighbours, which is a different concept.

Thinking further I suppose we could implement all MANET
neighbours as all MANET routers with IP TTL/hop limit
of 1. If that's acceptable (and I'd like wiser heads
than mine to think on that) I think we should say
something to that effect.


********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Manet-dt mailing list
Manet-dt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email