IETF Logo Mail Archive

[manet] draft-dearlove-manet-olsrv2-responsive-01

Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com> Fri, 13 December 2024 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D12C15106B for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:56:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y8pP0bLW4e06 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:56:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B362C14F6FB for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:56:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-aa670ffe302so398979866b.2 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:56:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1734123391; x=1734728191; darn=ietf.org; h=message-id:in-reply-to:to:references:date:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Kye2G0HAH3QzYCIEuJvFe941Whx7H1G9YMPfNGdqNWQ=; b=auyE758sQr/wMvtooHhMMK6SpCSKG+yZArq1AfpJRfQDwdjJZ8sbtzICkXEBpJwl76 GbtrRgmnbZ6oXNDGEV7y1lqsKZ87Bs8rK4Vo28xatvXC756XcVWJgj3RVlT8J4mM+s5P Qf+Vv0l7c5zX958l2n0tlEV9ieLWMKkU3k8HCFl5XcD9KbxJX3RIHcKDhz5eTXC/8pKK yTraC5WG7wF4FjvOq3Q7KMlq2+P04MVNy95gm+9tOlz5EVOn3yZlkkpKrFZcEYbQIIrh 2DH9WQB/SCRa/NEKlTsJPIwtLGmDVjgCmxHxAKevB8J4T807516x+syJjUDR3YF1OlGS ggCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734123391; x=1734728191; h=message-id:in-reply-to:to:references:date:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Kye2G0HAH3QzYCIEuJvFe941Whx7H1G9YMPfNGdqNWQ=; b=VXzgpg0l1tj6z9Ju0JC/s3HQaPsKNcZuCrc8XkR01XauUO68D09e7gIJOZ+/3nlihD YSl4cHnStQX1I5pnpo145hDiXlIwMrJ4Ox6CcMbCKt4e2KTrNc2zkGMhb3xbVA87JGJK xOwnTeUV3oJwVnQFIk0STtKg7LnoThGMKLIQuUpl4IcTeh6QAQ5d+uFFc8P8IbNa2LN3 WY8Z92WVhMNMWUPbZiCZmrYnZL3Y94hyAXoY5unUq/9Vy6RYTJcs37XaV1rm2v1U7LKM yhayk1iMR++SUVH493vEk9ciGuGjplcaT2rgo/Qn6U4WkNjOiUyxg2Bak7x6viCd49gM AZ3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwrySIciJaHS59y1aggYD3e6g6AG3tkRaVIzJedUjHWjmVQoMXJ 16CpZI6iQRwxqZK0KHSVAt7EOfpW256h6tnjkIZsTVdRLUDy91RWGmmLOQ==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctrqMOUy3oRdcDYBnZIkraVbK8ZQb1J2FgSMuXc/SoGbvnR8FoFqbDpWoJpDiE i7sib3ns9j3dhdHGfTOcfIbmIK8v+wFcvfhx49seFpJqqE58vgJXyqSKBHCE2GkTnRwMOXvHnxI EMFEuScjR/UOaqAOdvHdEebbcXFUX3lD7qbJ6RPPm8TKw5mmyN4ljYipvrUKL/PtdLIjFwwxmOh HMO1LdS3kz4rVd0VuVc/hCdk7yvQ0YFwDYZdwVOSj2lCE8Afc/ZGmRgXNm9q5Pw9pQblrFvMMls 9T880SIhoFxIr5k3G1nbyCXPq102doMj8E8bWkKOxX2pbKGVVw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFvi804dg3Sl8gYrjXDZ/jcuATk4VE7KsHhLoWTU8fufEN1RGza51pwUqVRePCNH4ZoxoC+vw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3118:b0:aa5:27d4:980a with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-aab77eb3245mr389106866b.49.1734123390651; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:56:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (82-132-226-148.dab.02.net. [82.132.226.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-aab96068af9sm13941866b.69.2024.12.13.12.56.30 for <manet@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:56:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.200.121\))
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:56:19 +0000
References: <CAF4+nEEXm9L=Dsg+Y2kpBRp7N5mcCPuNEvocoVv-OT5b8nZeyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "manet@ietf.org List" <manet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEEXm9L=Dsg+Y2kpBRp7N5mcCPuNEvocoVv-OT5b8nZeyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <F5DA5CD2-E2C9-4138-8094-E71CE54E3A01@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.200.121)
Message-ID-Hash: UF7HBV7G5S3J2WC5KTJ5WATEGQECC57P
X-Message-ID-Hash: UF7HBV7G5S3J2WC5KTJ5WATEGQECC57P
X-MailFrom: christopher.dearlove@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-manet.ietf.org-0; header-match-manet.ietf.org-1; header-match-manet.ietf.org-2; header-match-manet.ietf.org-3; header-match-manet.ietf.org-4; header-match-manet.ietf.org-5; header-match-manet.ietf.org-6; header-match-manet.ietf.org-7; header-match-manet.ietf.org-8; header-match-manet.ietf.org-9; header-match-manet.ietf.org-10; header-match-manet.ietf.org-11; header-match-manet.ietf.org-12; header-match-manet.ietf.org-13; header-match-manet.ietf.org-14; header-match-manet.ietf.org-15; header-match-manet.ietf.org-16; header-match-manet.ietf.org-17; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [manet] draft-dearlove-manet-olsrv2-responsive-01
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/-WpdSOJcF58bE3yffMLTcRxfGoo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:manet-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:manet-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:manet-leave@ietf.org>

I have uploaded a new version of this ID, as in subject line.

It makes no technical change to the -00 version, but I hope makes the applicability clearer. That is, a fully responsive network was the inspiration for the proposal, and the case in which it is needed. I don’t expect anyone to actually use a fully responsive network, for reasons as discussed, but a network that is more responsive (rather than scheduled) than usual may find the suggested additional message - permitted by OLSRv2, but not suggested in any earlier specification - useful.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status