Re: [manet] ordered data items in DLEP pause extension

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Will do.
Thanks,
Lou


----------
On June 14, 2018 11:01:04 AM "Ratliff, Stanley" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Lou,
>
> I haven't seen any objection on the list, so please go ahead and update the 
> document at your discretion. I'll get the shepherds write-up done for it, 
> and request publication.
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: manet [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 5:53 PM
>> To: manet <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [manet] ordered data items in DLEP pause extension
>>
>> ***WARNING! THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE VT IDIRECT.*** .
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> David and I discussed this - as I didn't feel strongly about this and his
>> comment was based on actual implementation experience, we've put
>> together a version that addresses his comment.  We also clarified the sub
>> data type field definition as it was somewhat under defined in the previous
>> version (I views this to be not a technical change, but rather an editorial
>> clarification) .
>>
>> The changes are:
>>     1) make the Queue Parameter Sub Data Item unordered by adding a
>> Queue Index field to the sub-DI
>>     2) formally define  Sub Data Item Type, the value (of 1) is not changed.
>>
>> The detailed diff can be seen at:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__github.com_louberger_dlep-2Dextensions_compare_working_lb_rev-
>> 2D03-2Dcomments&d=DwIGaQ&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-
>> eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=mnEUJ2au8QqXTC56YWj73bOOb2O9MdB4savOD1U0hMY&s=x9
>> ECG0V3j9XblKw-aiiLkhqJmDrATKwojHdB6Twkx38&e=
>> and full text can be seen at:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org_cgi-2Dbin_xml2rfc.cgi-3Furl-3Dhttps-
>> 3A__raw.githubusercontent.com_louberger_dlep-
>> 2Dextensions_master_pause_draft-2Dietf-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dpause-
>> 2Dextension.xml&d=DwIGaQ&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-
>> eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=mnEUJ2au8QqXTC56YWj73bOOb2O9MdB4savOD1U0hMY&s=G
>> c3VhcZN9eNCMTuywqNQo9U65VWP50q64gVPKLgnqE4&e=
>>
>> *No that this document is post LC*
>>
>> Does anyone object to this change?
>>
>> Chairs,
>>      Please let us know if / when we should submit this rev.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Lou (and David)
>>
>> PS we'll update the flow control document to have the same clarification
>> (#2 above) once we publish this change.
>>
>> On 6/11/2018 12:56 PM, Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL wrote:
>> >
>> > In draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-03, section 3.1.1 says “Queue
>> > Parameter Sub Data Items are an ordered list composed of sub data
>> > items with a common format.    The first sub data item is assigned a
>> > Queue Index value of 1, and subsequent data items are numbered
>> > incrementally.”
>> >
>> > I’d rather not allow the order of data items, even though they are sub
>> > data items, to convey any meaning.  It isn’t done anywhere else in
>> > DLEP (as far as I know), and I think that’s a good thing.  It allows a
>> > wider variety of implementations.  I believe this is easily fixed by
>> > adding a queue index field to the Queue Parameter Sub Data Item and
>> > adjusting the above-quoted sentences.
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > manet mailing list
>> > [e-mail]
>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mail
>> > man_listinfo_manet&d=DwIGaQ&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-
>> eUsbLW5
>> > r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=mnEUJ2au8QqXTC56YWj73bOOb2O9MdB4savOD1U
>> > 0hMY&s=VrJ_aOIkCHG6R0r_-EBsrsAUULWDLGQkWxAzZ4mBb1E&e=
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_manet&d=DwIGaQ&c=LlUvidvlhStGUS
>> xQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=mnEUJ2au8QqXTC56YWj73bOOb2O9MdB4savOD1U0hMY&s=Vr
>> J_aOIkCHG6R0r_-EBsrsAUULWDLGQkWxAzZ4mBb1E&e=
>
> ============================================================================================================================================
> This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
> information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
> and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
> recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
> intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
> in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
> copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
> in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.