Re: [manet] Request to Designated Experts for IANA registrations made in draft-ietf-manet-ibs

Thomas Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org> Wed, 03 September 2014 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C0F1A6F0E for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JONLtAUuOOKE for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9BE21A6F06 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDD81BC7139; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.147.142] (mtg91-1-82-227-24-173.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.24.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F2EA1BC7133; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Thomas Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D257)
In-Reply-To: <C18CE56C-77E0-454F-9F17-ED2CC215E620@nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:20:01 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <70C920EE-4DEE-42A7-AB9C-7171495E51B1@thomasclausen.org>
References: <BC28F83B-EFD8-4720-BF4F-76099B93F866@thomasclausen.org> <C18CE56C-77E0-454F-9F17-ED2CC215E620@nrl.navy.mil>
To: Joe Macker <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/1cbajemYlBFoYsfoXZT-Hn9TOQk
Cc: "<manet-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <manet-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>, manet IETF <manet@ietf.org>, Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [manet] Request to Designated Experts for IANA registrations made in draft-ietf-manet-ibs
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:20:10 -0000

Thank you, Joe, I will record so in the shepherd write-up.

Thomas


Sent from my iPad

> On 03 Sep 2014, at 21:18, Joe Macker <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
> 
> Upon review, I feel the assignments proposed are agreeable.
> 
> -Joe
>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:40 PM, Thomas Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Note: this email is directed to the Designated Experts, and is copied to the MANET WG mailing list, and other recipients “for information only” — this is not a consensus call ;)
>> 
>> Dear Designated Experts for http://www.iana.org/assignments/manet-parameters/manet-parameters.xhtml#cryptographic-algorithm
>> 
>> I am the document shepherd for draft-ietf-manet-ibs, which has been WG Last Called in the MANET working group.
>> 
>> That document requests registrations from the registry  http://www.iana.org/assignments/manet-parameters/manet-parameters.xhtml#cryptographic-algorithm, for which the registration procedure is “Expert Review” and where you are indicated as the Designated Experts.
>> 
>> This registry is created by [RFC7182], with Expert Review Guidelines given in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7182#section-13.1 — which suggests a few additional considerations, and then points to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5444#section-6.1 for further Expert Review Guidelines.
>> 
>> Would the Designated Experts be so kind as to let me know if you agree, or not, to the assignments made in draft-ietf-manet-ibs ?
>> 
>> Thank you in advance,
>> 
>> Thomas
>