Re: [manet] expiring DLEP drafts refreshed

"Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't" <> Fri, 04 December 2020 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B5A3A0ECA for <>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:10:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dy-sO0dNOlSE for <>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:10:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 175C83A0E23 for <>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:10:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; l=2206; s=mta1; t=1607101814; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/mUH8j8ijVjx8RDTZ1v8Ul2W2u+6f/x06MJYpKdXhg0=; b=e7hk7Jtsuwvy7eSx2OWN6OjmjaI7rfXoUnJKGwc8KFdJ2H8ZkOVAAYd9 rW+49tZPOEqyJgQeEixL5CBF5CBQSMA/DzTJ1jErjvFdPh5jK2BRLObUC tEbLqnextRa7fmbJ+sA5YRbommXgblW1CnnY6v8gslD6bb5zei30ZIicW o=;
IronPort-SDR: PTtAfE9pVaoCKi2dVMEFKaYW9M5MzBbLeMrX5ulhzqRTrWR57H24M+PqJC5PqhP/A2fz2vY+oC ZzMc7//K/zqEuSmWRdsB5hEVSQulRb5yTnj6ZEc5+6bXzuiiPs35fpVSoTlMLWPuad9uNEx7Lm SWF90h8zVCaS5FB8zxEGb1WfGorHM+K2vlJS1BKdMuzXxJma43MRxmBDX7/tZGD9O6+8099wvo 6s17z17GbRbjg7OwEwadMerXwZc2cAC55ca2WrCBPb9huh3NNkcCXd/JYG1vUrjVcDtmwipz3R wHDaSm61hMALMckqUSvH7u5A
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,393,1599516000"; d="scan'208";a="19328534"
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 18:10:10 +0100
Received: from ([fe80::c142:976e:5281:8298]) by ([fe80::c142:976e:5281:8298%7]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.006; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 18:10:10 +0100
From: "Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't" <>
To: Lou Berger <>, MANET IETF <>
Thread-Topic: expiring DLEP drafts refreshed
Thread-Index: AQHWylsFm9iVSD9ilEOprxLC2z7iqannJajw
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:10:10 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US, nl-NL
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
x-esetresult: clean, is OK
x-esetid: 37303A296F91A668637C61
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [manet] expiring DLEP drafts refreshed
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 17:10:27 -0000

Lou, Bow-Nan, David,

Thanks for refreshing these drafts and apologies for the long silence!

I promise I'll review them myself within one week. Furthermore, since the WGLCs issued back in March were all met with, let's say,  underwhelming responses, I am going to approach a few WG members directly to ask for their comments. I need a minimum of feedback to be able to complete my shepherd's write-ups.

I have been approached by one other party that has developed DLEP extensions and wants to bring these to the IETF.

Thanks for your patience!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger <>
> Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2020 17:32
> To: MANET IETF <>rg>; Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't
> <>
> Subject: expiring DLEP drafts refreshed
> Hi,
> While this group has been really quiet for some time -- I'm still hoping to see
> the LCs completed and submitted to publication. (I'm less sure what to do
> with the open adoption call.)  So, I've just refreshed all 4 documents as they
> were about to expire...
> Ronald,
> What are your thoughts on moving these documents forward?
> Thanks!
> Lou

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.