Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Fri, 03 August 2018 06:33 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B4212F1A6 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l78W6ypIIqTT for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E42130E20 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id k12-v6so7937853oiw.8 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 23:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GQ8KDHibeoexrLPZEVDJmOOaCbupNVTVqXSJj3qWLqk=; b=Pc7jOPv6NShqYjAyDv/b1RkED+JvVfpmbCwEBBx3UKb2r5Q0pdyOsGE13DOpPM7Ipl OOYwTty+mX2aKrqF/RdNgV8H68o7dViqweaxqSE2v7luhH9hvkT0N6fVPBLowTvb6wB6 1mz+qVPzxsy1XlJWt+HIAZEuteu6gZmnQUlv4CqGRxZ2c+3U6mbXCl+Sl016Eqzp2CHY 19go6B+gTXQ2Y2yRTMppXQfOCL4oyMQj1yDGRKnJ/WeR4lsHm6FOax/6CqnycrcQivoP Od5YMM9aqw++Iac6TkJ6jOjdCOlbpEvn8E4rAH6ofQmCl/6FWUmlLoOfgPjtwdGRNZxn rtIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GQ8KDHibeoexrLPZEVDJmOOaCbupNVTVqXSJj3qWLqk=; b=dMV1ZAQKKCVmrgRgfQ3VoLRMvp+4QvValXaFpU8TTO2T+DV2w4fux9HUlKflyIaCG8 kMX6tdnfj04PUYKacHI0IBi9dOMSQ6DhdFreSn47Gr4kTBMiiT3SJMpF6aZg4K9+xvTY OIxKfMnk7dzoVM6MWObthzGGBP/eP5k3xmWlV1tIUkllwanvq++3xZYQQFwc/qV1UZpS S7GwrNb0+2775s86wea6GbJzF+CB2ZpX9PEbY15yEtzYpzD8ODQDw8vbpd7AKlXn7VQe u9cSQ6TVT97gp0N68sPck50S/lGEJ5c4zakOn4hap6jOE+5d8AJhGnobHZoFyEjfRC40 bXUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFxUq6pLr+fcFsYJsEN7mfCdA95PT/nToRuSwXoZrqEHUEceCBX r8nE5KhO8X6buOB+lCyLJFpZeIwZADugVtLAaCQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd0hbRTTy1rdNAG0f88kwGAEC8CEiQAkXFtkvqfJeiQ2tmjgE9ZZq6ej2n5jwq1r54g2Gogk0f/qrucrhdEgk4=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:a6dd:: with SMTP id t90-v6mr2075421oij.113.1533277985261; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 23:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:d32:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f7c50a08cf884c1ebfd7107a3fc7f7b5@idirect.net>
References: <59d144dd-4ed9-cbf1-77e6-10f07f52f901@labn.net> <f7c50a08cf884c1ebfd7107a3fc7f7b5@idirect.net>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 08:33:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_xeWkSjroadeaYXgY0nua0-2tM7yFnjLZBfFvFq6Z9mQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ratliff, Stanley" <sratliff@idirect.net>
Cc: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a750750572821922"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/47EC9cQ2Rh5nFk47QwT-jlceZOQ>
Subject: Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 06:33:08 -0000

+1

AB

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Ratliff, Stanley <sratliff@idirect.net>
wrote:

> Lou,
> No objections here.
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: manet [mailto:manet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 6:03 PM
> > To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
> > Cc: rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org
> > Subject: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102
> >
> > ***WARNING! THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE VT IDIRECT.*** .
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >      I wanted to confirm a few points discussed at the last meeting
> (hosted by
> > CCAMP) before making any changes.  Here's what I understood from the
> > meeting:
> >
> > 1) WRT draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control-02 :
> >
> > The discussion concluded that the credit window control mechanisms
> > (messages and DIs) should be split from the traffic classification
> > mechanisms.  Assuming there is agreement, the traffic classification
> will be
> > moved into draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification.  Stan will
> also be
> > added as an author of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control as
> credit
> > window control is derivative of his earlier work.
> >
> > Does anyone object to this change?
> >
> > Do the chairs agree with this change?  (once you do, I'll submit the
> related
> > updates -- this impacts the four drafts.)
> >
> >
> > 2) WRT draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension-00
> >
> > The few people in the room who were interested in the topic, were
> > supportive of adopting this draft.
> >
> > WG chairs, can we proceed with an adoption poll or is the more WG
> > organization decisions to be made?
> >
> > That's it,
> > Lou
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > manet mailing list
> > manet@ietf.org
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_manet&d=DwIGaQ&c=LlUvidvlhStGUS
> > xQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
> > Wbxna8&m=qKxbx0l1JcLLOhKJNYY0WvdCpXDEF2kxU9ofjzk6Uqo&s=6KLiSOy
> > AvoycjlVYyaPBaLWrz4HOFi5NbsIvDSfs7QA&e=
>
> ============================================================
> ============================================================
> ====================
> This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
> information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
> and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
> recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
> intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
> in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
> copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
> in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>