IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-01.txt

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 06 February 2018 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2EE126DD9 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 01:05:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1MuWRtyInQ3 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 01:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0525F120727 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 01:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x21so798795oie.13 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 01:05:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LhKQnzQeuMXDMluczGpFZHrbVLx2WYLvTMo88cQpM3c=; b=q3HwHCFWT+Mp5zS3P32C6PBVeEGM99ONyXvyA3Jua2R+ixx8sLZ2EQ0WuFI0tSJD/m prALWeUvg9rYzNd8tTLu/mSi4Pnph3c+uYhd4c1BbRwPTvWm1zz3mrMcNn8/DmE90aYs GRj7SyoJKU5mnehOaO10z2dieIL/+miwb7z1vp/8uK2bHjN6wUHTqVfbK9u9IWsldFI1 SNUvSgAhg0YhyjlhYkg9bDYc1S2Su5aU6jeyE/azUzOKldmqC0FBtUTPk9XvJfRC1RN3 dVDMQHbDdjDURNWtBe28RJhW7wlcjtMUO/zGywSywVX+RVCB/gRFdkDw6m0GNgu1COq/ CDDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LhKQnzQeuMXDMluczGpFZHrbVLx2WYLvTMo88cQpM3c=; b=nD/ojF6Bu+fCiwfhf8T9zfOIT68z/eoCHO2RjOVD/nWX7NlBpEJJlRTg9GxoBUmliU FN5g01IVvhU6aOlLcGHdl/S8HHSZZNVcCNNTVjVn/zncw5nEoN2zoq9wsUlD/tpjzUwj 0Vv6tSf/6efw2Zz1PnKF72RgZmfslbO8VNsN26ydXu2gwDZmNyqPd2OkLwV72eBq3jcZ C8iibxeCRa7FNDFkMf8PrLAA5OMqyKg4BTxsi+G0czDStOUYjOg24j8s9AAi4lec+4Dj xaSGZ1pmmC5Cj50FmYKo7OM9nMlF4RuLwB36O4kP3w8aFC007hzPq0MZcdgF95mH6GSg l3uA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAlF+o7gGsHLJlVxL8h3zKoTN+UdofVJU6Vm+gkLIWivIhRKgFl ReHJJctjcLX7wa9zeNH3fJqtsoYTLtexNYzA/0Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227fqiLErlouMGUGebXWzzXiAdkinaUvAZhexjZSuhLaz1/fJ4raTJtRBRSMVMRkWePXVsskHy974h8dXt1GvZw=
X-Received: by 10.202.68.213 with SMTP id r204mr1090801oia.80.1517907928363; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 01:05:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.9.153 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 01:05:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F9801D32F4793@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com>
References: <151732120050.27516.9349844420176741896@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAGnRvuo0dXFdJcjvnbed216+Fu54sV2GYDQOP1hT+xuv3PpZWQ@mail.gmail.com> <1517831785.8344.5.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com> <CAGnRvupu-79BaAW-2vuNnB5Bs_eCr9HaH-Je_CvLfvYo2WL-VA@mail.gmail.com> <1517836460.8344.6.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com> <5a7886e4.2394500a.3b85e.bf5f@mx.google.com> <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F9801D32F4793@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:05:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-pjtGaq=QRLOXStz9Zi1Gfa+n+33bZadGC=uJ9MF0SEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Cc: HvFK <hvfk62@gmail.com>, "hrogge@gmail.com" <hrogge@gmail.com>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d74eadf3e8f0564877a1e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/6DXfHpInTKBramTVSBYXjLpI3PM>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-01.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:05:41 -0000

Thanks Rick,

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com
> wrote:

> Sorry for the top-post, damn Outlook.
>
>
>
> One thing I have considered is whether adding some worked examples to the
> text has value.  I have had to explain LIDs a couple of times to people who
> haven’t immediately realized that the extension solves their problem.  It’s
> always an issue with IETF drafts that they drill down to the raw protocols,
> often not explaining the problem space well (or perhaps it’s just my
> writing style).
>
>
>
> My thoughts are, perhaps a section covering: “So you have a Layer 3
> modem”, and “So you have a LTE/WiFi AP” and you want DLEP.  Obviously I
> hate writing text, I’m an engineer, but if people think it has value, I
> could find the time.
>
>
>
> Opinions?
>

I think the applicability statement section is helpful to mention solutions
or use cases. However, users always can contact authors of RFCs, or IETF
WGs,

AB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email