[manet] Request to Designated Experts for IANA registrations made in draft-ietf-manet-ibs

Thomas Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org> Wed, 03 September 2014 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A5A1A03A3 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CLgEDeOPpTdp for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9572B1A0394 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C8C1BC70A6; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from [] (mtg91-1-82-227-24-173.fbx.proxad.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44D5C1BC7091; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:40:30 +0200
Message-Id: <BC28F83B-EFD8-4720-BF4F-76099B93F866@thomasclausen.org>
To: Joe Macker <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil>, Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/6GJqzyarhSaO5oRZ4kRw4z_Pb6E
Cc: "<manet-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <manet-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, manet IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: [manet] Request to Designated Experts for IANA registrations made in draft-ietf-manet-ibs
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:40:38 -0000

Note: this email is directed to the Designated Experts, and is copied to the MANET WG mailing list, and other recipients “for information only” — this is not a consensus call ;)

Dear Designated Experts for http://www.iana.org/assignments/manet-parameters/manet-parameters.xhtml#cryptographic-algorithm

I am the document shepherd for draft-ietf-manet-ibs, which has been WG Last Called in the MANET working group.

That document requests registrations from the registry  http://www.iana.org/assignments/manet-parameters/manet-parameters.xhtml#cryptographic-algorithm, for which the registration procedure is “Expert Review” and where you are indicated as the Designated Experts.

This registry is created by [RFC7182], with Expert Review Guidelines given in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7182#section-13.1 — which suggests a few additional considerations, and then points to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5444#section-6.1 for further Expert Review Guidelines.

Would the Designated Experts be so kind as to let me know if you agree, or not, to the assignments made in draft-ietf-manet-ibs ?

Thank you in advance,