[manet] RFC 8757 on Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Latency Range Extension

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 27 March 2020 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26843A0F75; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id grXswlAgzaX1; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F6A83A0F6B; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8B8BBF40722; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, manet@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20200327174542.8B8BBF40722@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/6m2nfv07gtf7g1WP9Vm5WcZDqTI>
Subject: [manet] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8757_on_Dynamic_Link_Exchange_Protocol_=28?= =?utf-8?q?DLEP=29_Latency_Range_Extension?=
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:46:08 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8757

        Title:      Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) 
                    Latency Range Extension 
        Author:     B. Cheng,
                    L. Berger, Ed.
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       March 2020
        Mailbox:    bcheng@ll.mit.edu, 
                    lberger@labn.net
        Pages:      5
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-05.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8757

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8757

This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange
Protocol (DLEP) to provide the range of latency that can be
experienced on a link.

This document is a product of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC