Re: [manet] WGLC draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension
Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Fri, 19 November 2021 08:50 UTC
Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50C23A0CA6 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:50:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njtX_05nlnQT for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4FE3A0CA4 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:50:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id b1so39773093lfs.13 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:50:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VKL/YjVCXiRRoT829XDDBWD/hQ4RxN0/bPPtuS9lNyY=; b=GWiV5vrb6awm1oAi/a/DZx78n0UhwAC8G4/xwca+mTWGvfm6FyxHSO9/ekRYCuBH0z ojoKmwk5fC6jW4TRTq5/QB6IiVDUNWlUAoX4dcI2CHNNjIguSlrZs+IlzQ5PdBbq+7XE 8pOyTv6H54bfVs/Ezt+WrTtx4E//GjP34vdTN0hWjEUSxKbHOr/9scg0lA8XsefcwTvw qauUjsj/wdP+MFF/MhQHpO32WBHFOYo3eyVXztTZlgeR2Yj3f3wqvJT7OstXEEsxv2Ds Qq9yhREIYOtsrCpI+ZmVfjW477iI/O+l8shI/+1LB16+epZvpAVf2cygojGFScr4yk8g cOEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VKL/YjVCXiRRoT829XDDBWD/hQ4RxN0/bPPtuS9lNyY=; b=ouiCnVWLoBrroEzY16TYlZBPmuAhG0oukERXBjJZAZuoE1jdxr+x4JXjliuuwiCSeY pqyuLzz915UHsK8gvPsdg4g9f5SlXbftr7ThpU0IW9gtl8H2+IrS1xlxdy72fprUsyfW FWbrHi0/pY/0MRf0PtRK7UPl85xodAbltAaGKWw9QKbL58vivwBQjlb59Gi0HF/JaJHy TdbofNB3RDgEJRC8QNfyVAkdTrsM6NjCiZUKwAmLKzNf+IfjQiCKvO7C3Fus3tWKpCHq H89vnEn+9c0CFnlWbJUz7OhtLVIMpxR30jp47VPBsLj91N6aWOc9MfnVAmD3uaKSW6JJ N5BA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dkY3DtAxU76ta7cmGW4oUl3E3FtKV4ETP0LOy/j+l0qc6ygHp 11282VW9jgPoRSkGJBdF9OV6GMw6OcqL5M1sw987AGpnVA4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBA2pk181BihIOKpSBkE/tohOqeIBINOkFfCUy+Ho4GQFl+MIm4z4SgpN4ISoNpDFIliKQSYDUJx4lKj/wktI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5d7:: with SMTP id 206mr23927688ljf.133.1637311830710; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:50:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR14MB4030EE14F7320E5ABA507A99BB989@MN2PR14MB4030.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR14MB4030EE14F7320E5ABA507A99BB989@MN2PR14MB4030.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:49:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvur2t1cPjLd59bzADQRNBQggOHVN=bgc22qwLFUtAYbFWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Don Fedyk <dfedyk@labn.net>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/7BHYBrCgt85k0440U1obW9Sm3Do>
Subject: Re: [manet] WGLC draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:50:39 -0000
Hi, I think there is not much more to say about the DSCP based traffic class extensions for DLEP. We discussed the documents and decided on the consensus in the group. They ARE the most common way to signal traffic classes between routers, so they will be the usual solution bridging or routing DLEP radios will have to use (most routers don't want to deal with VLAN-Header traffic classes to signal the bridging radio). So I support taking the document as draft 12 describes it. Henning Rogge On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:43 PM Don Fedyk <dfedyk@labn.net> wrote: > > This is the start of 3 week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension, ending 2021-12-07. > > > > Please submit your comments to the list, also send a note if you have reviewed the document. > > > > Thanks > > Don & Ronald > > > > _______________________________________________ > manet mailing list > manet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet