[manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6730)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 05 November 2021 15:48 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420C63A0D49 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHNOj7QAIokV for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816E33A10DD for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 6B3BA21578A; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: sratliff@idirect.net, sjury@cisco.com, dsatterw@broadcom.com, rick.taylor@airbus.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, dfedyk@labn.net, ronald.intvelt@tno.nl
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: brian.sipos@jhuapl.edu, manet@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211105154827.6B3BA21578A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 08:48:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/833Blod3TvaQQJ3Apji_gK0c1wk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 08:54:23 -0700
Subject: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6730)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:48:32 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8175, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6730 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Brian Sipos <brian.sipos@jhuapl.edu> Section: 12.4 Original Text ------------- The Peer Offer Signal completes the discovery process; see Section 7.1. Corrected Text -------------- The UDP source port and destination port MUST be set to the UDP destination port and source port, respectively, of the UDP packet containing the associated Peer Discovery Signal. The Peer Offer Signal completes the discovery process; see Section 7.1. Notes ----- The original text did not specify any requirement about the source or destination UDP port number of the Peer Offer signal. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8175 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-29) -------------------------------------- Title : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Publication Date : June 2017 Author(s) : S. Ratliff, S. Jury, D. Satterwhite, R. Taylor, B. Berry Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6730) RFC Errata System