[manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 13 October 2025 06:26 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90620723A252 for <manet@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Oct 2025 23:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQoi2uTHfo5A for <manet@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Oct 2025 23:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BF2723A241 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Oct 2025 23:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-46fc5e54cceso3807805e9.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Oct 2025 23:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1760336796; x=1760941596; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=m4MP5sSEcphOunLUAhTRKs293N/kdCGQwTWMwHEeZ7w=; b=hOpncVf6QtOmFCvOzcSqkm/aWR1lf5UQMnNa0MPicTrhCUfwVan2AGKMF1B6t3VnHO QLt7jv+aKO7+Vds0GMeAMmpIZvbtUZTixxDCoRyUqv2bhzuE6p7sZKwTGB4VVB7wavJk C/z9FArwf/kV83pRzBdMhOVYxp3uhzDoGX/RqMBwHTBYZVTDmtQAWXzcCpxKg5hAdeXU +Ce2iAYj4frni4zPHI+jYHMoEFkLLSYL5MgHasRC8BsYNR29LREDG6hENsQb758DfMot uglo8i6jbztvmaUxs4FcVTJeoIt5nE/YDP+uypX2gT3Sn3WWeaKAXD3YZ3CSP1muDhis 5nvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1760336796; x=1760941596; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=m4MP5sSEcphOunLUAhTRKs293N/kdCGQwTWMwHEeZ7w=; b=vhNyevx3ptUECCtzaYUjhRF0NgjsnATikotJIf8cQgW9kdW0DsnAYRN6K6WKMPDltj vJcF+E+EbMGHMvy7a6qWM8DPjpMFE/SlmEY3o9IQP8ahbtQp6K/8VxTWPLd5IxCz/OOY l9nCHRpR6QwFtft/8uEx7u1L58Nuq9xPvnSRJlhDOBGKvoZFtJeUHQa0nrA9xmvb6Hdx tFW3iNt024aIh8+I/+uPlBxEhA9pvL/XEm5fkaaEkxsWUkBhVY9MWjF0SFdEA9Ee2Oey SPFuUCMl6XuNX6iY3V6/pFcKEMMXhpkBWQdvYlZo0pnD4PYTUYO0+d6azaRBY9X6HMOD d8DQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyDUq3JmJHwUi/Ii7uVLKIyPX8H3ObU64AGQi1/OyyJOlYZ8AP+ KUtvXZos8vvgN+Yg7DRYl9Fv1qtvS9JXx6ibt1WVEeZNphobOdSsVAJOw4s2hqJ+oNTT5cpqSIK 3kDViP4NXeD8A37lfWsUHOS6uC04Q7WOnQt92zwQ=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvQkzAvKpeFiDCt74TIPw+19Fj8o0jgIrJGgaVWIVr4RCR0RkpPxh9s6cOek5p tFyqa7cJC33FnwIfPiU+uEtQekiNHxJ0cB6IqKvOEZb2KfxqzmBk4QI+wMJNwBGsNA65U3uNkVD H0bxBh0ZI1Vm0R9vmnNekNFpv2WiMvf9FO0SDBrzAiwN2ot8evt2DJLV+1/yTPFm/klXOWxrf8z sbQcS5zj+ifXLEJ5eOICwBwiVFy0yPm0Ws=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGdm86ufCUDYLO8RyoA48A+OcEHi/x8ZYgt6yXF7xu/NDfYDnHwhPDwTUgOvVkJgshnsFLhZxWS9zwG8W6XvqQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e22:b0:46e:5100:326e with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-46fa9af8175mr122778245e9.23.1760336795872; Sun, 12 Oct 2025 23:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <174703496493.1518531.618313888065379630@dt-datatracker-58d4498dbd-6gzjf> <CADnDZ8-tyJ4UjfS0c4a-edgj_KUPTpTKLXPCsG+T3J1LGezS6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_J7sn08xh-UHio8ExguYYHhxyFsFP7YuDAWaAH3_332g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_J7sn08xh-UHio8ExguYYHhxyFsFP7YuDAWaAH3_332g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:26:23 +0200
X-Gm-Features: AS18NWDJUyIwWFLRQ9QF5-jkyWvoobqtLwg9VDmc4sW1fuMAtd_-fCoOJZn2VXI
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_v0_OSfVyoHtWkmjoAYhD3QR_NwMDEqom6VM4wm7q+sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: manet@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006738df06410459bb"
Message-ID-Hash: YEIIE5GQQWUFL5UXOGQ6KRKP4VAIMM4R
X-Message-ID-Hash: YEIIE5GQQWUFL5UXOGQ6KRKP4VAIMM4R
X-MailFrom: abdussalambaryun@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-manet.ietf.org-0; header-match-manet.ietf.org-1; header-match-manet.ietf.org-2; header-match-manet.ietf.org-3; header-match-manet.ietf.org-4; header-match-manet.ietf.org-5; header-match-manet.ietf.org-6; header-match-manet.ietf.org-7; header-match-manet.ietf.org-8; header-match-manet.ietf.org-9; header-match-manet.ietf.org-10; header-match-manet.ietf.org-11; header-match-manet.ietf.org-12; header-match-manet.ietf.org-13; header-match-manet.ietf.org-14; header-match-manet.ietf.org-15; header-match-manet.ietf.org-16; header-match-manet.ietf.org-17; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/9AzjrY8GU9wa9f8tClENqjCWFZM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:manet-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:manet-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:manet-leave@ietf.org>

Still no reply,

This is fourth reminder

AB

On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 9:44 AM Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> I still did not get any reply
>
> this is I think a third reminder,
>
> best regards,
> AB
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:25 AM Abdussalam Baryun <
> abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi draft-author and WG,
>>
>> My review AB-2  for the subject titled WG draft.
>>
>> Before any review just to say that this draft is not updating RFC8175,
>> but this is an extension draft.
>>
>> Firstly, this new draft has some changes due to reviewer-discuss, so I
>> would like to discuss with you those changes
>>
>> >Active Time:Time in nanoseconds since the channel has been in use
>>
>> I agree with the definition of active time within the table 1, so I think
>> this is the total time of the channel available for communication, so when
>> we change in the draft as define as *used*  doesn't that mean busy channel.
>> If yes please amend because I think the table 1 should be consistent within
>> all draft
>>
>> This draft supports 8175, so the *dynamic-links* can be point-to-point or
>> shared medium as mentioned in RFC8175.
>>
>> > Abstract>
>> >This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange
>> Protocol (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel
>>
>>
>> AB>amend to>Abstract>
>> This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol
>> (DLEP) to provide the radio channel utilization tlv to the peer router. The radio
>> channel utilization provided measurements at the modem of the data plane
>> radio channel for the router awareness.
>>
>> AB>reason> the abstract is short, and it needs to specify the extension
>> is tlv_extension, and  we need not to exclude that some MANET may use
>> separate data/control planes/channels per router-modems.
>>
>>
>> AB>
>>
>> > draft>section 1> introduction>
>> mentions the channel utilization (unicast traffic) between two routers,
>> so is it only point-to-point  links this draft is specifying, Please
>> advise?
>>
>> >draft>section 1>
>>
>> >A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor
>> (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for
>> each DLEP neighbor.
>>
>> AB> amend>  measurement how a radio channel time is used and how much
>> time resources are available
>> AB> reason> radio channel doesn't always/only mean time.
>>
>> AB>section 2>
>> A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor
>> (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for
>> each DLEP neighbor.
>>
>> AB> the channel usage will be reported per used-beam, because  DLEP
>> neighbor may have two beams per one radio-channel. There is a spatial usage
>> added to the time resources.
>>
>> AB> does the draft consider the dynamic channel allocation issues?
>> AB> why not adding L1-channel/traffic type value?
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> AB
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:30 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt is now
>>> available. It is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET) WG of
>>> the
>>> IETF.
>>>
>>>    Title:   DLEP Radio Channel Utilization Extension
>>>    Author:  Henning Rogge
>>>    Name:    draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt
>>>    Pages:   8
>>>    Dates:   2025-05-12
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>
>>>    This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange
>>>    Protocol (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel.
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization/
>>>
>>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.html
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>
>>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> manet mailing list -- manet@ietf.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to manet-leave@ietf.org
>>>
>>