[manet] [Errata Rejected] RFC7181 (4872)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 25 January 2017 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7150D129A54; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:40:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5th90nNq0ao; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F664129A37; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 45CC7B81C44; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:40:41 -0800 (PST)
To: nmalykh@gmail.com, T.Clausen@computer.org, chris.dearlove@baesystems.com, philippe.jacquet@alcatel-lucent.com, ulrich@herberg.name
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170125164041.45CC7B81C44@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/9RgE_bLG8BGujJ4KkXoMn0QyW2M>
Cc: manet@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [manet] [Errata Rejected] RFC7181 (4872)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:40:42 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7181,
"The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7181&eid=4872

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2016-11-30
Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG)

Section: 16.2

Original Text
-------------
   TC messages MAY be generated in response to a change in the
   information that they are to advertise, indicated by a change in the
   ANSN in the Neighbor Information Base.  In this case, a router MAY
   send a complete TC message and, if so, MAY restart its TC message
   schedule.  Alternatively, a router MAY send an incomplete TC message
   with at least the newly advertised network addresses (i.e., not
   previously, but now, an N_orig_addr or in an N_neighbor_addr_list in
   a Neighbor Tuple with N_advertised = true or an AL_net_addr) in its
   Address Blocks, with associated Address Block TLV(s).  Note that a
   router cannot report removal of advertised content using an
   incomplete TC message.

Corrected Text
--------------
   TC messages MAY be generated in response to a change in the
   information that they are to advertise, indicated by a change in the
   ANSN in the Neighbor Information Base.  In this case, a router MAY
   send a complete TC message and, if so, MAY restart its TC message
   schedule.  Alternatively, a router MAY send an incomplete TC message
   with at least the newly advertised network addresses (i.e., not
   previously, but now, an N_orig_addr or an N_neighbor_addr_list in
   a Neighbor Tuple with N_advertised = true or an AL_net_addr) in its
   Address Blocks, with associated Address Block TLV(s).  Note that a
   router cannot report removal of advertised content using an
   incomplete TC message.

Notes
-----
Unnecessary preposition "in"
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
 From Christopher Dearlove (author):

The "in" distinguishes the cases of N_orig_addr and an N_neighbor_addr_list. The former is a single address, the latter is a list of addresses. Therefore one looks for the address as the former, or in (the word that should not be deleted) the latter.

This erratum must be rejected. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7181 (draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-19)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2
Publication Date    : April 2014
Author(s)           : T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, P. Jacquet, U. Herberg
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG