IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-02.txt

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB27C129454 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:14:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kw8tXSfjDEGv for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:14:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6121200FC for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:14:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id r39so17132295qtr.13 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:14:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BJ40phSn3N6kaT/VSkOTScVNxG5MEL8zU3fa7vvoay8=; b=bGY94LQED7uvXQjVSztXeiEgmvs7WUpB5DnEEHjVW8gqWmH/mN9RWZbHIst8aBDqNT WZtbla9K5M9kT8yovhHsufFvFraBPxjtGET+Wg+ZqatLYCLPVhQoCF5KlkwuWIgzAiUW /7YLPfFUxNB2XlfTZh2XHbW+I/WA4NU/V4VZhl8/lO3O/q7Oz/eOcG+kJ7M5xj3MtQYp 6obHORN5C1DnMTA6+88Y1JfwiiSla2p/+jpOFDPxW5Br+SFihIBcjqPKAL0hSqcb0Ol7 2iPToQoNOrLci6/vsM6iTrw3S962TFrpqWF04JJejuT9MzgtgOZJL3Gq07yW/tszFg22 qLLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BJ40phSn3N6kaT/VSkOTScVNxG5MEL8zU3fa7vvoay8=; b=rQP3rroo6Wt44tTtjJIXo1hUpj8W3DuVtmYy83xYHSFhjTAubtrUGfhBlaJjUwRfo9 eiG8kxiVJb2UdyQ7QFrygHNqjUUBGLXMN6bH4RIAWJN6p4JNaaNvbnNaoM/imYw4emg0 TtgOUgbRC9usRx9DfnzHdG96WT+GgGQ10GSswT5IGI2s3B0HA+S8tRYtsMDTErpotVv/ L0VRfqHzbTvS+0oR9ljq+9vsfGcGBBFNaYbFU/XlEGK1eygHE7FxjFU4IpCiXGmyZimt 1a8xB0L6GRqETTA+5MLVDW2zZ0TnCjX+Aq5zag8i1KILJ8xwyUW9upeaxSysg5IuArWV IVbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5cx8ni8+0foptL2SA1xpk3BHe5euCp3Tzf48HVCxzFOKtTDBiI BUsZkw5jUrtVqwuJKrncb1Zqig9MbT40MYY4vlQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMY8o+9RAr6R1/ERUj8YGQEIuXz1rPbM+nVyP5ZE6Cgxh1FjTSjVngzi2GKwKMkm/in2GMOaXeyYfVicsTkBGyo=
X-Received: by 10.55.51.73 with SMTP id z70mr22858563qkz.338.1510744478333; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:14:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.35.175 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:14:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F9801D3237830@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com>
References: <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F9801D3237830@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:14:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuoMv0WhACwsB-DkK=h73fGxbYpkdZDdz4imrfvt7fLVyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Cc: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@idirect.net>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/AVEcU3yOzeT4dv2V1Tq3BcrYbks>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-02.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:14:42 -0000

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rick Taylor
<rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com> wrote:
> That I would suggest was the purpose of the Session Update Message. Which
> unlike the Destination Update has a corresponding Response message.

I always thought that the difference of "Destination Update" and
"Request Link Characteristic" is that the first sets a value that the
originator of the message is responsible for and the second asks the
other side if it could maybe reconfigure...

That's why I thought about a "Request Channel/Interface
Characteristic", to mirror the "I would like something like this"
mechanic for the interface.

Henning

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email