[manet] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 13 July 2019 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54791200E0; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 08:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension@ietf.org, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, manet-chairs@ietf.org, bebemaster@gmail.com, manet@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.98.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <156303053773.32654.13106491641379759058.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 08:08:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/BrwY0O08QRZx2zlgXndHtXSLOpE>
Subject: [manet] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:08:58 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for this short and concise document.

I just wonder whether the packet size is taken into account for the minimum and
maximum latency if compression/serialization is taken into account the
measurement.