RE: [manet] ARP in MANETS

"Yi, Seung" <Seung.Yi@boeing.com> Tue, 25 April 2006 17:17 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYRAL-0002rL-Qd; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:17:33 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYRAJ-0002rF-TK for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:17:31 -0400
Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com ([130.76.32.69]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYRAF-0003Z5-Fc for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:17:31 -0400
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com ([192.76.190.6]) by blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (8.9.2.MG.10092003/8.8.5-M2) with ESMTP id KAA24613; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.11.3/8.11.3/MBS-AV-LDAP-01) with ESMTP id k3PHGiG02758; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:16:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-5V2.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.55.45]) by XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:16:42 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [manet] ARP in MANETS
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:16:41 -0700
Message-ID: <8BA40F9A33179E4E877E37D7D5E9D82D0133AEAD@XCH-NW-5V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <444E5064.7060401@telecom.lth.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [manet] ARP in MANETS
Thread-Index: AcZoiyzOeWBojy2eQmWYwxKp5lyhXgAADbwA
From: "Yi, Seung" <Seung.Yi@boeing.com>
To: manet <manet@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2006 17:16:42.0784 (UTC) FILETIME=[05C05A00:01C6688C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Cc: Rex Buddenberg <budden@nps.navy.mil>, fxbaloch <fxbaloch@wichita.edu>, yasser lotfy <yasser.lotfy@lycos.com>, Ali Hamidian <alexh@telecom.lth.se>
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-bounces@ietf.org

Hi all,

I did a small project on this issue when I was in the graduate school
and 
this paper came out as the result. You might find it interesting.

ARP Considered Harmful: Manycast Transactions in Ad Hoc Networks
C. Carter, S. Yi and R. Kravets
IEEE WCNC 2003 
http://mobius.cs.uiuc.edu/publications/WCNC03-CC.pdf

Regards,

- Seung

Abstract
ARP handles neighbor discovery and address resolution
in infrastructure networks, but is inadequate for Mobile Ad
Hoc Networks (MANETs). Thus, many MANET routing 
protocols include a neighbor discovery mechanism. This 
separation of neighbor discovery and address resolution 
is a fundamental design problem that causes packet loss, 
particularly when the communication is manycast, a novel
variant of multicast communication. Our approach, automatic 
address resolution, moves address resolution into the routing 
protocol along with neighbor discovery, correcting these problems.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ali Hamidian [mailto:alexh@telecom.lth.se] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:38 AM
> To: yasser lotfy
> Cc: Rex Buddenberg; fxbaloch; manet
> Subject: Re: [manet] ARP in MANETS
> 
> 
> 
> yasser lotfy wrote:
> 
> >Hi All,
> >I don't see any point in having ARP in MANET.
> >
> >MANET relies on 2 fundamental technologies:
> >1) The use of IP layer routing to relay packets to destination.
> >2) The use of ppp to discover nodes at 1 hop distance
> >
> >Therefore, you need only to know the MAAC address of your 
> immediate neighbor. Typically, listening to the wireless 
> media is good enough for that.
> >  
> >
> And if you want to send to a station that is quiet? Then I 
> think you somehow must request its MAC address.
> 
> Kind regards
> Ali
> 
> >All distant neighbors are reachable via IP routing layer.
> >
> >Does this make sense?
> >
> >***********************************************
> >A train station is the place where trains stop, A bus station is the 
> >place where buses stop, On my desk they installed a workstation !!
> >***********************************************
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
> 

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet