IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7182 (5346)

Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com> Fri, 04 May 2018 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C964512D87A for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2018 10:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OlM8u9KuPyXJ for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2018 10:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672D9126FDC for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2018 10:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id j5-v6so6204983wme.5 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 May 2018 10:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=JKJhHw95OEbkaC5seWjgHInyovS69fBScgv8my+QwRU=; b=SEhXs/jyWr0nbVsZ0PectQcN27nuBs46do7cYf5BhW3/DuNkHI4uqQOEuIdfOQbC/U tecODPx5kbPtPOBu9qvRbhV2MG0dt2Qo1OTBiSuGGDSUDfXijk+vnD1ms3aYB/tajZNV JmRZ0AdIbR7MtjZewqmoP+IR+fSKouXCYDu1x03EeFggKutqWx5MCUnzb2/DqVSXDquu AQnSnpwNFOfPy56KXMx9ycvPEaWt/JJQ4oqcpI7jhNJTcpJnTjOZQBu+IG7/KqR0tFnJ 4asDWY6JvO/8SPd8Yn9OGb8DwwRIoERK6RG11Sp27/Y6jB8wGRImqxHJ0NpkgeaxjT36 z+tw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=JKJhHw95OEbkaC5seWjgHInyovS69fBScgv8my+QwRU=; b=Txk+2bA1K1ZiZsugcgli5nRMYNbNg0omCCFO6fyZLlK7pdpryRiulTnWLBIbUo/X33 oXFf4Wf0l0sBGWXm9eMoucNN4gytWYco+jbSVEx0/fUgUvS9hfku2JbX64889CwRzx0J Pu+6gF8gFxkVHmRBBKK3MNP0MZEnf3TkT1n/42uRMhZpaaKjQHX541Fe9v3UhA826JYg S00v6/2AAQmG2s4YXMZGRuzB/GOo2qkNQaRAEVoal2dj8HjnryiVfEn1PcIOxm70fOXb KBsO6zAEJGaDRdAhT86eNVQ2B9spScus5L4OO+UKjjrabjDkapOAH++aqJHSD8yzQkPC 4vew==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCuVOSPMOdC/m+NwSy7u3xF4pvtdu++wkRp8NzXsZ5BkSDpQhFo INVRt0ArpViOf65OIKuf/UY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqN63FgdzrlAaozAHvIgJ/TySbxHuC8bLzbVT1fcfcdVyeDCxBj3hZ1l8TssLZK5EpQnvF0+A==
X-Received: by 10.28.241.8 with SMTP id p8mr18522635wmh.84.1525455890877; Fri, 04 May 2018 10:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.91] (host86-141-73-109.range86-141.btcentralplus.com. [86.141.73.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g78sm2635652wmc.27.2018.05.04.10.44.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 May 2018 10:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20180503121232.7ED66B80D6F@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180503121232.7ED66B80D6F@rfc-editor.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <6F8F38D0-7AB2-42E4-A9E9-250C733171A1@gmail.com>
Cc: ulrich@herberg.name, T.Clausen@computer.org, chris.dearlove@baesystems.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, bebemaster@gmail.com, sratliff@idirect.net, manet@ietf.org, denis@ovsienko.info
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14G60)
From: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 18:44:49 +0100
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/CbsfZFTjTMmFEpY-7rYy9u39mog>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 May 2018 11:09:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7182 (5346)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 17:44:55 -0000

Fairly sure never intended as a Roman numeral, just a typographic error.

-- 
Christopher Dearlove
christopher.dearlove@gmail.com
chris@mnemosyne.demon.co.uk is dead

> On 3 May 2018, at 13:12, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7182,
> "Integrity Check Value and Timestamp TLV Definitions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5346
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info>
> 
> Section: 12.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>      then L > log2(NRT/P).  For example, if N is 32, R is 1000, T is
>      86400 (I day) and P is 10^-6, then L must be at least 52 bits.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>      then L > log2(NRT/P).  For example, if N is 32, R is 1000, T is
>      86400 (1 day) and P is 10^-6, then L must be at least 52 bits.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> A Roman numeral in this context makes it more difficult to follow.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7182 (draft-ietf-manet-rfc6622-bis-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Integrity Check Value and Timestamp TLV Definitions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)
> Publication Date    : April 2014
> Author(s)           : U. Herberg, T. Clausen, C. Dearlove
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status