[manet] DLEP LID extension
Eugene Reznik <ujenreznik@gmail.com> Sat, 18 August 2018 10:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ujenreznik@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D30129385 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 03:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tSBpi8YgnonH for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 03:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5197126BED for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 03:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id s12-v6so8238701ljj.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 03:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=umInkf7D1MOsdbLPT7WKYi6nTPwB2oe6hoELx/cILo4=; b=CViVDsPh0jUvRtk187M6un93PNnuDAsT/6mk1vnJT3FG1V3Qx9o8FgFw8+MxNm/avN L1ydTsXVQ2O2crga4E88tVVmjf2Cx3+kzmR9KjIiIrCa4tdeN7zqRoZAvmY1nc73dGmO lKk7yWYwNt0de5jQQGA3mLWDmlUYtvY6x54SvFY5h8W+aYFXVaLZ6k4P57RLbdJejHkF GpAYl4Hjk/P9NKx2QWyr6avNZNbM/vTxtQXf00gUcgs5qXT0t5uuuuck211qhYnl+QTt TeJh33Wn+646TaxnrC88ZBLyLv+klDaECWK1gFl47NbBX9i7kLYSRRPZq70VCUmIlHka /NAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=umInkf7D1MOsdbLPT7WKYi6nTPwB2oe6hoELx/cILo4=; b=pgJ7+toSTyb6OQRC41If+u4Gy2NxkiprgYS5Lt1lB9FC0HuWG2sZSgmCn8kOuD2bti Byn25WkPPLFlvtgLmioZpHQqspISwGOHUxWkYw+sH4YW3fkMQj0D06u2liPxW8qTUHoE zcMefhsPlDA0K+fz/tB3kKIOozBOkDfbdj5AopN5578w7odzkTNj/legkn5bbWmefo+p 3weFw5FA7C0RRafoBc35QX5KYvGcryOYdlW/HKuR29JcFsDUh/py721R/lPxH3SW5BaS xjrgp2///I9nS4zia73vju88gnKohorJtSs8Ey/XHNHdsgO1wM0u6XSlW89ZKZIWHI5p t0cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEQSKoG/18VHBUQbbYyb+22iYiiID13y35v5upjcNf3uLDOP31x uPzeAu/cFLGqtPCwY4ZCd1C9hkRr6LrGqr8gJpSDmg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxCzNWqCgiQHHSudsF09Gvat0dNvNqYY0fxgo4OHhTs+19+99LTByR2NyDoEDpjFK/eYQHWSfeHumnW3OYN2wY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:998e:: with SMTP id w14-v6mr10219222lji.7.1534589809060; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 03:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a19:e347:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2018 03:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eugene Reznik <ujenreznik@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:56:48 +0300
Message-ID: <CANs5Vwcv9-QYsdP9KzLSG3a3rLRpbj3TtcYJAq582EDF8OKYEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: manet@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000071eda40573b3887e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/CwCTAqPtWMduQ6LzxtTuuCqcBu0>
Subject: [manet] DLEP LID extension
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 10:56:53 -0000
Hello, I wanted to make sure that I correctly understand the draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-02 . The draft says in paragraph 3.1. that the default length of the link identifier data item is 4. However, in paragraph 3.2. it says that the default length of the link identifier data item is 5. The value of 5 made sense in previous drafts in presence of the Flags field. The Flags field length was 1 octet, which led to the overall length of 5 (4 octets of the link identifier plus 1 octet of the Flags field). In this draft there is no mention of the Flags field. Can you please clarify what is the correct default length of the link identifier data item and whether the Flags field should be present? Regards, Evgeniy Reznik.
- [manet] DLEP LID extension Eugene Reznik
- Re: [manet] DLEP LID extension Rick Taylor