Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
"Ratliff, Stanley" <sratliff@idirect.net> Tue, 06 December 2016 17:56 UTC
Return-Path: <sratliff@idirect.net>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6426512947B for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:56:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=idirect.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DwVtxF_dmTsY for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00229401.pphosted.com (00229401.pphosted.com [148.163.159.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 739C7129400 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0097890.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00229401.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uB6Hu6MU017657; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:56:09 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=idirect.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=dk1; bh=KARc8o3AVxoThVi3l/9FY6/QsDGoopgB5urNRxeBVzg=; b=RwRSB77GpBxcj6rCmvnvl9LsqxepMBLaVrVK7aRmkiR7HyyUVrlaZCOefHuA1NedzXOO LM0vtmne4iCv9I2eab1n1uUmnxmyjsBRPMPLBD/SUugEtefPRy6KDFfhHYSZy5h4l+lZ p1bQCV65NtTXXp5k8zIAUmZJlNs9K3NdXYXtkPayd4ikgHk5BcLon4DruUh+FN8Datm9 rZ1g/z+EmDXu6MJVkbon8A3wu6QOlu5N1jGQep/cf+8VabcBD5yzX1moMWjfPhSe1sXa 3Bi0B/6p38i6ltMoO7gdOZn1QpAWbHnQiGTlY4Zsv0HJtgcw1NTz0LFBbpDZOj3BCiIO Bg==
Received: from webmail.idirect.net ([198.180.159.2]) by mx0b-00229401.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 273u8haemw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 12:56:09 -0500
Received: from VAUSDITCHM2.idirect.net (10.250.250.202) by VAUSDITCHM1.idirect.net (10.250.250.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1236.3; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:56:08 -0500
Received: from VAUSDITCHM2.idirect.net ([fe80::b5b6:9e50:3403:e75d]) by VAUSDITCHM2.idirect.net ([fe80::b5b6:9e50:3403:e75d%15]) with mapi id 15.00.1236.000; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:56:08 -0500
From: "Ratliff, Stanley" <sratliff@idirect.net>
To: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>, Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
Thread-Index: AQHSSYvOMRONXpStV0Gm/SWjUwqUNaD7J+6AgAAYNrA=
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:56:07 +0000
Message-ID: <b52758dca0c04c3abfa326af10bf3d29@VAUSDITCHM2.idirect.net>
References: <CALtoyokY4GE1LHeGjUXmrHT-TF+=t=QcLuzLpcs7pLBm0RDURQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGnRvurOv3VLk3s6EtnZ_vciY+a5sMLnS4Gw1yLzmY-XroDLFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvurOv3VLk3s6EtnZ_vciY+a5sMLnS4Gw1yLzmY-XroDLFA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.250.250.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-12-06_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outboundspam_notspam policy=outboundspam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1612060270
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/DT9l9BlSiL9e3IJHPcox99_nD0o>
Cc: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:56:14 -0000
Henning, Interesting. You're the second person I've heard lately that mentioned the notion of DLEP flows. So, what do you envision a DLEP flow to look like? I'll be honest - this sounds like a lot of complexity, and I'm not entirely sure what it buys us. Can you enlighten me? Regards, Stan > -----Original Message----- > From: manet [mailto:manet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henning Rogge > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 6:27 AM > To: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> > Cc: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello working group participants, > > > > One of the items identified during the WG meeting in Seoul was to > > formally request, via the list, Working Group adoption of 5 extension > > drafts related to DLEP. This email is that formal request. > > > > The drafts are: > > 1. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_ht > > ml_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dlatency-2Dextension- > 2D00.html&d=DgIC > > Ag&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK- > eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-Wbx > > na8&m=BCoPI7uYl2VWWZLOiT2_hvChwZeOzOv5lfyrfADyR_8&s=0WQ- > snJj88VGKf7xJj > > 3iHvybVGepqcFgS1dnP_67erE&e= 2. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_ht > > ml_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dpause-2Dextension- > 2D00&d=DgICAg&c=Ll > > UvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa- > Wbxna8&m=B > > > CoPI7uYl2VWWZLOiT2_hvChwZeOzOv5lfyrfADyR_8&s=Cy0zgSTLb9cojir1_ars > JUAqn > > lWqY3yr2_cJGplaSfA&e= 3. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_ht > > ml_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dmulti-2Dhop-2Dextension- > 2D00&d=DgICA > > g&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK- > eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-Wbxn > > > a8&m=BCoPI7uYl2VWWZLOiT2_hvChwZeOzOv5lfyrfADyR_8&s=iPynr3nKX2q > hgYAEdfd > > oEJAblVkiRDiQCgQ1oS8BtbQ&e= 4. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_ht > > ml_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dlatency-2Dextension- > 2D00&d=DgICAg&c= > > LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa- > Wbxna8&m > > > =BCoPI7uYl2VWWZLOiT2_hvChwZeOzOv5lfyrfADyR_8&s=3Zl09TGLH5nuj_vy > h8ih-GL > > BQzufwZxd6g-2DK1JHm4&e= 5. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_ht > > ml_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dda-2Dcredit-2Dextension- > 2D00&d=DgICA > > g&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK- > eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-Wbxn > > > a8&m=BCoPI7uYl2VWWZLOiT2_hvChwZeOzOv5lfyrfADyR_8&s=XN5_qWwK2 > x8PWHRRT8y > > xW9Dv6hITxVGv4xxGBQ4o9JY&e= > > All of these drafts contain valid (and important) extensions for DLEP, as long > as we keep in mind that we might need to shuffle the ideas around between > documents I definitely support adopting them. > > establishing a concept of "flows" for DLEP would be a good start for a more > generic document, which we then could use to describe how to select these > flows (e.g. DSCP) and how they are handled by the radio (e.g. prioritization > order) and to control the flow for each of them. > > Henning > > _______________________________________________ > manet mailing list > manet@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_manet&d=DgICAg&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSx > Ql0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa- > Wbxna8&m=BCoPI7uYl2VWWZLOiT2_hvChwZeOzOv5lfyrfADyR_8&s=ADneD > atu54Qas369e3xZr1qA4a6zsMVEVzReVdEUjYo&e= ============================================================================================================================================ This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
- [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group docu… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Ratliff, Stanley
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Ratliff, Stanley
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Cheng, Bow-Nan - 0665 - MITLL
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Ratliff, Stanley
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Henning Rogge
- [manet] Fwd: Call for acceptance as Working Group… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] Fwd: Call for acceptance as Working G… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] Fwd: Call for acceptance as Working G… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group … Stan Ratliff