Re: [manet] draft-lou-manet-sturp-00 (was Re: IETF 117 draft agenda posted)

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Sun, 16 July 2023 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA5CC1519A5 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=irif.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ch83nG8D-uZU for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D931C1524DB for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:1]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 36GM5QEx028339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:05:26 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay2/82085) with ESMTP id 36GM5QnI026016; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:05:26 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9547B3AEB7; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:05:25 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=irif.fr; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date :received:received; s=dkim-irif; t=1689545124; x=1690409125; bh= D2gHrN/eU8q2ttnx9ykF6ayH0SVZp1gAAZLUbGetj8g=; b=k5l1/HPC18PLZyqu yDiygfNLc+DLnXoFLIg6Na0TBSywC1yru8pHTmaJz1kRVSr994ZDuuvAmEV/0LPS kS2eybz2sCO2azJ+KVqVrIF9rVtL2zyXaFfEY1w1hH52cH9TSewDqxAM/4ecvyP3 Vo9Djo982imsBEwGMAl7grQb1cTJiKD2pgkmvKn3/LedhA2NUCleDQYZ6nfTgJwo YuF5n6CC4c5i1+u1o8r2IBEgV8KB1onC0+DIsisDHDTbMGdw1BEK4etbyDfuaaGW PLGiyA779WWrEAsvTtrdihGNPtQRyQfvn+efTCG55KwVdgDyn4oQJ50cqr9qvTjb 7dpzFQ==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id NzEwQnX8In3G; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:05:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3D463AC7A; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:05:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:05:23 +0200
Message-ID: <87edl7ikbg.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Zhe Lou <zhe.lou=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <e3a4aa9754294f289f6f819fda8c963b@huawei.com>
References: <8149ebd18183496daf8cd64e2f85ff37@tno.nl> <2E4FC045-1A9B-433A-AD60-7C79168977B8@gmail.com> <e3a4aa9754294f289f6f819fda8c963b@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/28.2 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]); Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:05:26 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.141]); Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:05:26 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 64B469A6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-Miltered: at potemkin with ID 64B469A6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 64B469A6.000 from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/null/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 64B469A6.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 64B469A6.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 64B469A6.000 on potemkin.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/DbsK6qnMiOBhGcfmF3qN-oHSJKI>
Subject: Re: [manet] draft-lou-manet-sturp-00 (was Re: IETF 117 draft agenda posted)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 22:05:38 -0000

Dear Zhe Lou,

Prompted by Christopher's review, I've had a look at the draft, and I'm
frankly not sure that I understand how this protocol works.

STURP builds a routing table (Section 5.3 of this draft).  OLSRv2 builds
a distinct routing table (RFC 7181 Sections 4.3 and 19).  Which of the two
routing tables is used for forwarding packets?

If the intent is that the STURP routing table overrides the one computed
by OLSRv2, then how do you ensure that this does not give rise to persistent
routing loops?

Thanks for your help,

-- Juliusz Chroboczek