[manet] Multicast Work

James Nguyen <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com> Thu, 09 August 2018 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD3D130E2A for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JQVzsO4DSSVS for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59AE9130E23 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id g6-v6so5559011wrp.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 08:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aZpikCa33N/4Ql567P0bqwc10Pw4byrRKtOEfleEW5U=; b=qw5Rf8HE/C3NB5ye33AUtRoFfhEDn4Cp94drI8jY9AsihfJz4rR802nug58uK3TvqJ DOsYm2QQAs/N9qR0MWtjq3ikvPtAGgdKmOn+ZSmGNOt/X3D2BhwbtZMsGlE10moZb4Mk 7xTbEVVCF8tGRZy+Rm5aDOi6Z9UZDR6aAfNVTOQ2ghmGTK2tDHMy6ORC+tkoFMo5tA7t DcV462rok2THjiXXrVfOi5JqZDTjNgR6wn/MPXbAZ7814yDE9oqfBvvTPATAcHXuIKDB DTyrKlp8lNsHDgU0kb+s84k1CDni/53+j2/Q7PEW8dRSo3VDc/SFDoZER/BeDM9H5vp2 p65g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aZpikCa33N/4Ql567P0bqwc10Pw4byrRKtOEfleEW5U=; b=soWlJS0UXyZ37dtRk9q4HHBqNEmsvjCPhzRSetq3Fc1rh8iPzQfsVxaav8Lzeyv2SO Tfrw5WsfFwaEgXhopL6SNxookfEORU6zXamTZQFb0fFXvN24SKI71/H74J6YF5qBzgXW zw5ckrzTGoIrBYfDbJoGXWeoihIH8TNdyRpCwzgFI5zfupOCdBzq9zhE6BMcILQuSKei hGMyGt2diopQ150FY0fhFNr/fiFRjZ7uwI+T0EkXEdqW/HNWVxhTAQ6hF6JcHbtwXSTp wxoo8bAl7ZgVeAobtGXhf/2qEO/IBbHg3SG3E+1Dw+4UoPtlnuxe+5yZcf16GAzSLiaX 3aAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlH6z+0AKwCj99pJpj4LGTF70iG8Xi5soBnYWD7dI855pd+8BaIA aCuKGq5Kg/Oi8NOhTjKF1QYsWjbF/ETkGnhbsMaK/lE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwcCaxFVnH8hJ2ecO5lnBVEJsWSk8Wo/JifzhZetT7ugU2KwF3pPnjf30+3wwsGAGB2tr79rSC9Hw0lZkOd3CE=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:d08c:: with SMTP id y12-v6mr1832635wrh.152.1533829118530; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 08:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a5d:6787:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Nguyen <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:38:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CANF4ybvadZgCMK--j576yH6K9zDSCDvpYaqbGyLOY=VyPnZs+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: manet@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c19c890573026bb0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/E9Bv0BnrPbntF63CwgKKtJWKoaY>
Subject: [manet] Multicast Work
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:38:43 -0000

Hello WG,

We haven't really worked or at least entertained multicast work although it
is in the charter. Is it still an active action item?

Another thought, is there any consideration to adopt elastic multicast or
ODMRP as experimental standard or leverage some of the efforts to
contribute towards to the multicast work?

I look forward to hearing from the chairs and the WG?

Regards,

-- 
James Nguyen
Email: james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com