IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730)

"Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu> Wed, 10 November 2021 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB913A1314; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 11:58:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jhuapl.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3VIXrqWT2w0j; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 11:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aplegw02.jhuapl.edu (aplegw02.jhuapl.edu [128.244.251.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E9003A1315; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 11:58:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (aplegw02.jhuapl.edu [127.0.0.1]) by aplegw02.jhuapl.edu (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1AAJvKDD021856; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:57:55 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhuapl.edu; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=JHUAPLDec2018; bh=pao5IF7cdWF77qM1N/jVYky08wjTGJDe95LOYduFdkE=; b=TtjoEqLrHVoibgUfuwoqHP+eK86vv90QHZh7fY3IrWu3Mw5dpZbj7nOG4SrAJK/G/LVy DcpEqT+QaoQPthw17zFEQKugkO/ZmRUsjDSA9yq2g4jW6FT6viviTZvWLFZoyPEhchPl O8vGy46M4PNJ940uD78NLYzOzm2tZcQUxamze9i2UUsBXQgej+61rJYduTyLc0Y6MAFa deKsMu8IHuKeglKNVDnBPXsh4QUyuKDn7mzsbm4bgo43tROBrlRCDcaHQXeRJX9rkllj vqP0R6KctzLHSUZUxVGxKIgFD6p5eV7pMAlUR9GUPRJw5NZSRvDCQwk7hkKrIUy1w9DD hg==
Received: from aplex20.dom1.jhuapl.edu (aplex20.dom1.jhuapl.edu [10.114.162.5]) by aplegw02.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 3c7kb3suhy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:57:55 -0500
Received: from APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.6) by APLEX20.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.13; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:57:54 -0500
Received: from APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::3c73:f90:20fa:eda1]) by APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::3c73:f90:20fa:eda1%5]) with mapi id 15.02.0922.013; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:57:54 -0500
From: "Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "sratliff@idirect.net" <sratliff@idirect.net>, "sjury@cisco.com" <sjury@cisco.com>, "dsatterw@broadcom.com" <dsatterw@broadcom.com>, "rick.taylor@airbus.com" <rick.taylor@airbus.com>
CC: "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730)
Thread-Index: AQHX0oufAJdEi8P0q0mWdN1VmDoL7av6Mw/A
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 19:57:54 +0000
Message-ID: <1b58d4d4f9014a8398ffd5a93459cdd8@jhuapl.edu>
References: <20211105212513.7995820EA07@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20211105212513.7995820EA07@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.162.26]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01C0_01D7D643.564515C0"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: APLEX20.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: APLEX20.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-11-10_09:2021-11-08, 2021-11-10 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/EtvgdKw-qOLX0G_ivYdrVoOtZCw>
Subject: Re: [manet] [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 19:58:10 -0000

All,
This last errata was about UDP fields, not IP fields that the earlier errata
was correcting. They both just happen to apply to the same signal so they edit
the same paragraph. Can this item be resurrected?

-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 5:25 PM
To: Sipos, Brian J. <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>; sratliff@idirect.net;
sjury@cisco.com; dsatterw@broadcom.com; rick.taylor@airbus.com
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com; iesg@ietf.org; manet@ietf.org;
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730)

APL external email warning: Verify sender wwwrun@rfc-editor.org before
clicking links or attachments

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8175, "Dynamic Link
Exchange Protocol (DLEP)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6730

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Brian Sipos <brian.sipos@jhuapl.edu> Date Reported: 2021-11-03
Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG)

Section: 12.4

Original Text
-------------
The Peer Offer Signal completes the discovery process; see Section 7.1.

Corrected Text
--------------
The UDP source port and destination port MUST be set to the UDP destination
port and source port, respectively, of the UDP packet containing the
associated Peer Discovery Signal. The Peer Offer Signal completes the
discovery process; see Section 7.1.

Notes
-----
The original text did not specify any requirement about the source or
destination UDP port number of the Peer Offer signal.
 --VERIFIER NOTES--
While this is a valid report, it is a duplicate of Errata ID: 6472.  I am then
marking this one as Rejected.

--------------------------------------
RFC8175 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-29)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)
Publication Date    : June 2017
Author(s)           : S. Ratliff, S. Jury, D. Satterwhite, R. Taylor, B. Berry
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email