IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 11 April 2019 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EE81200D8; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=goR+0IDj; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=aOkYPsLU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S-Hxlw6OCp1D; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F38412017B; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0E12789E; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:06:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:06:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm2; bh=zmIMj/USbkNEVKU/OR8pa0S zwK6JS5diFA3Bh29POPQ=; b=goR+0IDjE8rJrbhRGbyuP1vkp18DfqYzdWLcV4Q YMxWMqMnR+CnxF8PseBtgZUOrXCJh1Jacm6LikBjVyNL4DthdCMY+Ok0Pkm2j4iq leBWgS2ocVsCfvCrk9dogRDSx7BMyd4dyL6P0wedyApTtbr3mnbfqUyYlrCJxQeU 9af1tFzkNozJqaI8Zme236Zsqgl0mUwvFSeZupsh9b/AruykQ1OQdfVc78R8TuD2 KuXyPJa1ueLVXVsHVVCki8S/pdKCHgAl8YUGiwvxjAfALrsS6V91AtPAKa35uGHv Mez5hngdfz4Y54qzyUkfcCc8kgqji3LIdVeu4oMSH8v31HQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=zmIMj/ USbkNEVKU/OR8pa0SzwK6JS5diFA3Bh29POPQ=; b=aOkYPsLUWQfCzKIliU2UTd ZP6SIyY5kRpZ8kF3uZXE2aJDXF44yPDwMwDiaTLNB5FNBSMDW8vN8XEtQSF+h15A hz1H/MxKBAtvLYoNTbtNnQfS6M7N2IlKruW5VQXVZZQsfoWd+NlerUCYa9qxYjou cFMXRaaaH7qaU9MyECpI7+A24ioSHwXOSPHjXANd+p8LM6vTBYfSQwyf9jGLvGK2 TUG7aRrmeSwq+pL/4UWBtKdCgbcptyh8YS/dd6wiLnR7tKfmpUTtkA7WnQbrBSe4 rF2AD8/TxZOinudKCS8a2mwWKQJINy9lj1PPJJWtaEoM9JT6VIZR63iAbE/1PfFg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:6juvXBAIKsRN_uemYjWkZbMM8ldle2-I1sflELKKGvJWSVpzODlyhQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudelgdeiudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhkfgtggfuffgjvfhfofesrgdtmherhhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgr ucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucfkphepudejfe drfeekrdduudejrdekjeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegt ohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:6juvXI9S0J7mRzj4Pq0opcXknlg0btxL3MTkpxb2vhT0tRTB5OPPlA> <xmx:6juvXNb7lbb7ps2I3hgE3-rVOEi4FKx5uDIhL90Xb13go6v1k6Y4nA> <xmx:6juvXHHT0ZdO8L0DjtNKyoPqKwLiAQvT5rzVN0GJGK13vVgYtAXW0A> <xmx:6juvXLSSQX8yl4sLqgYYQrVjzvFM9ySrT89J4poJcsn0pWCCvIwFCA>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.87]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 99892E415C; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:06:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <6CBEC07D-A6E3-455C-87F8-6CB2DC0C1BDF@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ADF1AF6A-1FEE-4D62-AA10-8A8CE70BE961"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:06:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESswp1BrNmOA1ariTegokJQOaGpi5YRGiVy3DYXiuxUGLwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Stan Ratliff <sratliff@idirect.net>, manet-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension@ietf.org, manet@ietf.org
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <155492518369.22601.15786320586524280536.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESswp1BrNmOA1ariTegokJQOaGpi5YRGiVy3DYXiuxUGLwQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/GFXAqLeYjmwldHUWIBoGrMkGhgg>
Subject: Re: [manet] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:06:54 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

> On Apr 10, 2019, at 4:36 PM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On April 10, 2019 at 3:39:44 PM, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker (noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>) wrote:
> 
> Alissa:
> 
> Hi!
> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> DISCUSS: 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> 
>> This work item does not appear to be inside the scope of the MANET charter, at 
>> least based on my reading of the charter. Am I missing something? 
> 
> It is not explicitly called out.  However, I believe it is part of the general development of DLEP, for which the WG is responsible.

Is there any scope limitation to the functionality that could potentially be characterized as further "development of DLEP"? I ask because from a quick read of the base specification, it doesn’t look like pause/resume was contemplated, and as you note this was not explicitly called out in the charter whereas credit windowing was. I’m wondering what the boundary is around the functionality DLEP is expected to provide as a protocol.

Thanks,
Alissa

> 
> Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email