[manet] WG AD pointed in meeting118, We need more charter discussions
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Wed, 08 November 2023 04:04 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B21C18FCDE for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 20:04:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lrG71P3BwW2A for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 20:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3E0C17061D for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 20:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c5b7764016so86482801fa.1 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 20:04:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699416239; x=1700021039; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=j4yzDgbLyidIrJULv+kYWFj+8RZXJbx0natnH5FOL94=; b=DB/Iobr/8QEXQ7kBWoQspNDUwpXW82As/IwwspBfT69EORpS1wSdNN3kzQbYCEU0PX UldznpDRdfm0cfpu1lTdoy1WxpyMrUROfRwRe12fRVWp7zxfNdPbX3v0E1p0t5TvhUpl aNzowNwX+Ie9cnHrgg4NANIY5EZxGeTQPWZhsp1+4kGg2Z+4QrW2BkUCzBjsMvDO+ILi OIJcXJZR2gChkUPo7r2gHtvCwlJxczlnrCv5r/iwv1a8nYusxa9H2PFVdvwX32vM1jKA O8MSHlvf9MCeEPTmUZ2FWjc/SnGaYSWGqv4pqzLeNfn379RacAXyi8QM7M0HmTxnTE2f F+0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699416239; x=1700021039; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=j4yzDgbLyidIrJULv+kYWFj+8RZXJbx0natnH5FOL94=; b=usVrdgOeUS5Gmig2txrNzYxhc2QGd4ekQQtk4dn09148vD97lm44hNryhsv9dahIWS XN+K/dYJBIvy8FnSHrq3uxDhGYEGxlIpL+VV19qwECk60/wx1dgigjLrsW6FCtNACWrY F2bXEv60sYKW4HgdHhYEoEkGhNKDvlOLujSnHIEQa3jcXVGFJ7ViZj5/UN99Vq7rKLc6 wo6LdaUluwe/hzguGqbndrZqDxDweCem3NbHO9YK8FgHrVGMaKOSIaeq2KpK8VDj0W+e yHsEP0PVtiP6rfc45N2ei9WuRpIXaJGw1YLBzpenIfA5oXU1ZHev3BfRWI5637c/QdZC knAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwLJCxs2XUasKWeOf+6fCAFCx/0t4MuC+klicuvTyjrhsWTVtSA 4BNEQwyETQlzGGupE1iPoJ2xyshl066bG8y96+W4Wi1V
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHLahF+YkP9LoT5D2tc2qG/0QCtN8PaXBm7UFRwZfY2u18en+eBk6Rha3N6J7BrFFj2LF9xLZlqYX7Y01DTCuE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9904:0:b0:2bc:f2d7:f6ce with SMTP id v4-20020a2e9904000000b002bcf2d7f6cemr587826lji.49.1699416239060; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 20:03:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 05:52:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88izWctU8_P6dSqkenYcWk7Atf3jJOa8Xrrk7wF4B_CrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: manet <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000413bb606099c2dbb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/IYHiIZSXP1OjMVnBb0PuTW6hgPw>
Subject: [manet] WG AD pointed in meeting118, We need more charter discussions
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 04:04:02 -0000
Hi All, Regarding this issue of low volume of participant input, usually it is normal in many IETF WGs for some our main_responsibility reasons especially within corona19 years, however, I don't think within IETF WGs there are low respond for the WG charter proposals. As Jim mentioned I agree that we need to discuss the WG_charter more, and also agree to show interest and why we are interested as Juliusz mentioned for multicast. Furthermore, IMHO we should not push back input/proposal/discussion_topics just because it has no implementations announced/heard, due to many ietf_standards (including our manet standards) were adopted before implementations known, so simulation implementation tests are acceptable as start for discussions/adoptions. Finally, Don mentioned we need input drafts, so if there is interest for topic please submit them including why we should not do multicast if that will be the direction for now. Best regards AB
- [manet] WG AD pointed in meeting118, We need more… Abdussalam Baryun