[manet] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6731)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 05 November 2021 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917FC3A0FE1; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id drbIiul0PSMM; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FFD33A0FDC; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id C789920EA09; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: brian.sipos@jhuapl.edu, sratliff@idirect.net, sjury@cisco.com, dsatterw@broadcom.com, rick.taylor@airbus.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, manet@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211105212536.C789920EA09@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 14:25:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/L4c8h_LlhuWCv3xXrKX9PZUScoA>
Subject: [manet] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6731)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 21:25:45 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8175,
"Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6731

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Brian Sipos <brian.sipos@jhuapl.edu>
Date Reported: 2021-11-03
Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG)

Section: 12.4

Original Text
-------------
The Peer Offer Signal completes the discovery process; see Section 7.1.

Corrected Text
--------------
The UDP source port and destination port MUST be set to the UDP destination port and source port, respectively, of the UDP packet containing the associated Peer Discovery Signal. The Peer Offer Signal completes the discovery process; see Section 7.1.

Notes
-----
The original text did not specify any requirement about the source or destination UDP port number of the Peer Offer signal.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
 While this is a valid report, it is a duplicate of Errata ID: 6472.  I am then marking this one as Rejected.

--------------------------------------
RFC8175 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-29)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)
Publication Date    : June 2017
Author(s)           : S. Ratliff, S. Jury, D. Satterwhite, R. Taylor, B. Berry
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG