Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05.txt

["Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <[e-mail]>]

This is missing the point that that’s exactly what’s happening. The multitopology draft is entirely optional, and experimental. I think it’s correct to consider this as an updates, but as noted, different people draw lines in different places, even ADs. It’s in their hands.

--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Information Assurance Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: [phone] |  Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> | http://www.baesystems.com

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687

From: Abdussalam Baryun [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: 09 March 2015 02:18
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05.txt


*** WARNING ***
This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an external partner or the internet.
Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any attachments or reply.
For information regarding Red Flags that you can look out for in emails you receive, click here<http://intranet.ent.baesystems.com/howwework/security/spotlights/Documents/Red%20Flags.pdf>.
If you feel the email is suspicious, please follow this process<http://intranet.ent.baesystems.com/howwework/security/spotlights/Documents/Dealing%20With%20Suspicious%20Emails.pdf>.
Ok, I will wait for the judgement call from WG AD. However, my advise is to not update our single topology standards with multitopology, and to leave it separate from multitopology standards.

AB

On Wednesday, March 4, 2015, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <[e-mail]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[e-mail]');>> wrote:
That this updates OLSRv2 is inherent in the specification. If the draft didn’t make that explicit, that was an editorial oversight, nothing more. Whether it updates 7188 (and XXXX which is tlv-naming) is a matter of taste, we put that in in order that our AD can make a judgement call.

--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Information Assurance Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: [phone] |  Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> | http://www.baesystems.com

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687

From: manet [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Abdussalam Baryun
Sent: 04 March 2015 17:02
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05.txt


*** WARNING ***
This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an external partner or the internet.
Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any attachments or reply.
For information regarding Red Flags that you can look out for in emails you receive, click here<http://intranet.ent.baesystems.com/howwework/security/spotlights/Documents/Red%20Flags.pdf>.
If you feel the email is suspicious, please follow this process<http://intranet.ent.baesystems.com/howwework/security/spotlights/Documents/Dealing%20With%20Suspicious%20Emails.pdf>.
Did the WG agree to allow this draft to update 7181 and 7188? This new draft has added the update!!!

AB

On Friday, February 20, 2015, <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Multi-Topology Extension for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2)
        Authors         : Christopher Dearlove
                          Thomas Heide Clausen
        Filename        : draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05.txt
        Pages           : 21
        Date            : 2015-02-20

Abstract:
   This specification describes an extension to the Optimized Link State
   Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) to support multiple routing
   topologies, while retaining interoperability with OLSRv2 routers that
   do not implement this extension.

   This specification updates RFC 7181 by creating an interoperable
   extension to it.  This specification updates RFC 7188 and RFC XXXX by
   modifying and extending TLV registries and descriptions.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************