[manet] Re: Proposed tweaks to charter text

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 05 November 2024 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEB9C151095 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:17:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T7QYQBNBEPJh for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0577CC14F726 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 02:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43161e7bb25so40587905e9.2 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 02:16:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730801810; x=1731406610; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iUWv2p9bAQZA7dOfENUxeJaPqpxWQ5d2mr1xJ7JzFoE=; b=aNNwkFFOlBeveU+l2CFszv2O718Isg4zGNyC8SlhHW6wr1vj9+aVlzYSUa6OvKUZX4 dHOzb4jJ0bDVKFK83qEamgF/TKsPhQH/8I5rOzHr5IWoZwFB6hl6ppBxDDoz2OHyF6LK smuffEUm21x6a9nEiFJlcTaRXcuwPp63M2jJl0ni43l6Rfr1Rvyr1mpG8p5DgaFQBkRf edRnNZtPMaTwttCnW2zoUxYXsku8iDUemx3wJ0N6TcB0gOZAGVSK55OlLcmIzDJHbixk 6FahHcJ0fow1G60OJCD+7uInib8fywHK1hauAmyuNmA189r0S0dnnVLEcJzvdQMhrI30 kecA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730801810; x=1731406610; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iUWv2p9bAQZA7dOfENUxeJaPqpxWQ5d2mr1xJ7JzFoE=; b=PK5eRT96c9z/hH48+LsBowtQqJfzXLPlbTl9Tl2UOgrBXNg+hwWYFl+faHhzBuW6t0 ZJl7H4XFTnKHwnKS/mmp+p827stdL60Af5cCAEJQ5VL+InJ+aWLeOs7pmmZdtlKqdasP zrgPLLfxEDfzeqi55UBC14z1cPE63b9w0xjKH/d5I3GvsSgoZWonhHeownUVU/3/3G34 4UxwyTP4aPCXBQFduDZzlAfiue6cSPOI1D7ypa5m6KzjArUgRtGECE3hoB8mAVE5VeDY xn+V6+u42R2I1O3XmpTqwxTL3ebgc4pAhcpDEcb72MpJ0Alh4nqhOsIX6Y6cIWekxh/U A9KA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywt9fNhviyFNcupJfuqjYvHBYc0kOS0eediwavcjqpebxqziD92 NTyxba0FQsi14VTnO2G+ljg2wm+sDI3mPQSwAdpALlZfNDjPTcpCduGPngH8OhfY9Yc1B0zYuTL ffIdyq3AalJG/Ra5Bmsc/SqMh2Kt8F1yD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFraBVnxQwsQjtz/FC+tUIk/0PNAW/0HPOPmT9m9sZDoiTN/NuIj4JEX1FuSjungC1HqUjZ+R1yhnshBc3QPbM=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e686:0:b0:37d:3964:e0f1 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-381b70578b3mr17951131f8f.4.1730801808622; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 02:16:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87h6bzcoss.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CADnDZ88rnvjbeD=msZ6B+XBb3pzQQTbMjJ0EyPYkHH13L3Kv6g@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88kUo8P+W-bv9o0rGuTeUsZJ+LG_OKBN1BhOMBSMkswMw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ88kUo8P+W-bv9o0rGuTeUsZJ+LG_OKBN1BhOMBSMkswMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:03:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-3UQaV+8PK3oG9-j2y47w=4AzQ7MSVKSh5oeTOFhMp=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: manet <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000facd7b062627b24d"
Message-ID-Hash: KMKHE7OLGGNFNZK5UBFQOLN5NYNQXOYR
X-Message-ID-Hash: KMKHE7OLGGNFNZK5UBFQOLN5NYNQXOYR
X-MailFrom: abdussalambaryun@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-manet.ietf.org-0; header-match-manet.ietf.org-1; header-match-manet.ietf.org-2; header-match-manet.ietf.org-3; header-match-manet.ietf.org-4; header-match-manet.ietf.org-5; header-match-manet.ietf.org-6; header-match-manet.ietf.org-7; header-match-manet.ietf.org-8; header-match-manet.ietf.org-9; header-match-manet.ietf.org-10; header-match-manet.ietf.org-11; header-match-manet.ietf.org-12; header-match-manet.ietf.org-13; header-match-manet.ietf.org-14; header-match-manet.ietf.org-15; header-match-manet.ietf.org-16; header-match-manet.ietf.org-17; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [manet] Re: Proposed tweaks to charter text
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/M9hWK3DeDtgvpRtmBYvnuQamP6E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:manet-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:manet-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:manet-leave@ietf.org>

I read the present draft of this meeting 121 text-00, and my comments are
as : AB>

also by reading and considering the current charter approved draft
charter-ietf-manet-04
mentions:

The purpose of the MANET working group is to standardize IP routing
protocol functionality suitable for wireless routing applications within

both static and dynamic topologies with increased dynamics due to
node motion or other factors.

AB> I think the above should be in the new charter, usually this WG needs
to consider routing applications as well as functionalities.


Approaches are intended to be relatively lightweight in nature, suitable
for multiple hardware and wireless environments, and address
scenarios where MANETs are deployed at the edges of an IP
infrastructure.

AB> this also needs to be included to be considered for our WG. Not
excluded.

Hybrid mesh infrastructures (e.g., a mixture of fixed
and mobile routers) should also be supported by MANET specifications and
management features.

AB> this maybe can be changed as done in the new charter presented in this
121 meeting.

When routing devices rely on modems to effect communications over
wireless links, they need timely and accurate knowledge of the
characteristics of the link (speed, state, etc.) in order to make
routing decisions. In mobile or other environments where these
characteristics change frequently, manual configurations or the
inference of state through routing or transport protocols does not
allow the router to make the best decisions. The WG will put
special attention on the standardization of a bidirectional,
dynamic link exchange protocol (DLEP) between the router and the modem.

AB> is important to be using DLEP for situations that needs knowledge of
routing of physical layers. So this text needs to be included as well.

best regards

AB

>