Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102

"Ratliff, Stanley" <sratliff@idirect.net> Wed, 01 August 2018 21:38 UTC

From: "Ratliff, Stanley" <sratliff@idirect.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
CC: "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102
Thread-Index: AQHUKFHD6iKq2e+mmUGBpKMFv0bLaKSrb04w
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 21:38:43 +0000
Message-ID: <f7c50a08cf884c1ebfd7107a3fc7f7b5@idirect.net>
References: <59d144dd-4ed9-cbf1-77e6-10f07f52f901@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <59d144dd-4ed9-cbf1-77e6-10f07f52f901@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/MUxTXFMuV7cK8LpXjuPI9J6BD8o>
Subject: Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102
Precedence: list

Lou, 
No objections here. 

Regards,
Stan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: manet [mailto:manet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 6:03 PM
> To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
> Cc: rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102
> 
> ***WARNING! THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE VT IDIRECT.*** .
> 
> Hi,
> 
>      I wanted to confirm a few points discussed at the last meeting (hosted by
> CCAMP) before making any changes.  Here's what I understood from the
> meeting:
> 
> 1) WRT draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control-02 :
> 
> The discussion concluded that the credit window control mechanisms
> (messages and DIs) should be split from the traffic classification
> mechanisms.  Assuming there is agreement, the traffic classification will be
> moved into draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification.  Stan will also be
> added as an author of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control as credit
> window control is derivative of his earlier work.
> 
> Does anyone object to this change?
> 
> Do the chairs agree with this change?  (once you do, I'll submit the related
> updates -- this impacts the four drafts.)
> 
> 
> 2) WRT draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension-00
> 
> The few people in the room who were interested in the topic, were
> supportive of adopting this draft.
> 
> WG chairs, can we proceed with an adoption poll or is the more WG
> organization decisions to be made?
> 
> That's it,
> Lou
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_manet&d=DwIGaQ&c=LlUvidvlhStGUS
> xQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
> Wbxna8&m=qKxbx0l1JcLLOhKJNYY0WvdCpXDEF2kxU9ofjzk6Uqo&s=6KLiSOy
> AvoycjlVYyaPBaLWrz4HOFi5NbsIvDSfs7QA&e=

============================================================================================================================================
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102 Ratliff, Stanley
[manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102 Lou Berger
Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102 Lou Berger
Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102 Rick Taylor
Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102 Lou Berger
Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102 Justin Dean
Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102 Abdussalam Baryun