Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents

Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> Mon, 28 November 2016 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD9C129F47 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:44:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pI987y7FNll7 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:44:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0550D129F7D for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:44:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c21so229397958ioj.1 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:44:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UuE2+oxGrCN+ZMJ6Cy2Yah+nUtP8jKzPZ2r3jtvLEtM=; b=eL3w2xcRyNvqgV0tpGe588YxJiUFc1iqe77XpnUVhnNybHF2JPRQA2KC4MtVG+jhf3 ML481iTZ0pQo7Turcr6xHyNM0YVYWyQ4DHFD92fhTeKbF+S6u7CE24TQmWbEVkH4YeQh Qjqcn5MkNHHLDaIXhzHchB28j0BHcYxM+mBeryrV6COpzYA9yqNO0YJ1V/22ZjRcKLx/ eG6wTfNn/BFOwMtvFblKh8hbF1XEe+oLNdFQQkSgWgKcCIytt6h5bK28IhbaOraBmx78 +QgCYUKDU7Fa1uysdX2eKsMycVQpT1PZ0vGOAWDwYQnGn9zlBLXDzLvKpai9e2XcHEr9 wSRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UuE2+oxGrCN+ZMJ6Cy2Yah+nUtP8jKzPZ2r3jtvLEtM=; b=Wfdhx90d8Rllm6cKkS5H2M6hWoiqJX6iwsyQ/MB95MB5D+nY38WRvL3uIEzh//OA8b V6SKW4nZ3D18WagsoKZvTY1+V/yi8Id6JiTnXgenBJkL47gkL4ganBOm6n/SouQxq1ef ZkAH9UFsJMAPweQIrFg86y/3kAZ6d8gDr7wIcMjwOD2UHQ1E2dAr44ZTuKc/f+WtEtk7 5EYOcDoBpgdROVlVoEZu6HsNpiuPMyNM4wDW8asKqpOrUv8B+v+DGWpuiLl0JLGitk0Y JbIp6DRlujI8a1jp9z3vt/8QmXyGqW1HHBMT+JbI+6IBOgnPAwSn2cza7f6E/jbG8JmR cNKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02iimJn1XafmLKxxPoSRIVYe3JLrmwWgseTBwGbIKJgV2dMquExTEJhMg/h/UWJvbDG3qkJk749f6uh0Q==
X-Received: by 10.107.164.35 with SMTP id n35mr17859245ioe.171.1480347844506; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:44:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.13.22 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:44:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D461B820.37CD%David.Wiggins@ll.mit.edu>
References: <CALtoyokY4GE1LHeGjUXmrHT-TF+=t=QcLuzLpcs7pLBm0RDURQ@mail.gmail.com> <D461B820.37CD%David.Wiggins@ll.mit.edu>
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:44:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CALtoyon79kQev4=cTSeyEfMSccUb-yTxgABy60QZoKYrnA3K2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL" <David.Wiggins@ll.mit.edu>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114215b06a7af805425e574e
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/MtvV-AqRugvi0gmIy-0udyvpTKQ>
Subject: Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:44:59 -0000

David,

Oops. I claim Monday morning fogginess after the long holiday weekend, and
being insufficiently caffeinated, as my excuse! ;-)

WG,
My apologies for the duplication. There are but 4 extensions, but the
question to the WG is the same: To adopt, or not to adopt?

Regards,
Stan


On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL <
David.Wiggins@ll.mit.edu> wrote:

> Hi Stan,
>
> I think #1 and #4 are the same thing, aren't they?
>
> David
>
> From: manet <manet-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Stan Ratliff <
> ratliffstan@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM
> To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
> Subject: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
>
> Hello working group participants,
>
> One of the items identified during the WG meeting in Seoul was to formally
> request, via the list, Working Group adoption of 5 extension drafts related
> to DLEP. This email is that formal request.
>
> The drafts are:
> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-
> latency-extension-00.html
> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-pause-extension-00
> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-
> multi-hop-extension-00
> 4. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-latency-extension-00
> 5. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-
> da-credit-extension-00
>
> I have put all 5 extensions on this email for expediency only; please do
> not assume that they must be adopted as a group. The chairs would greatly
> appreciate thoughts from the WG, both positive and negative, by December
> 12.
>
> For purposes of determining WG consensus, a lack of a response will be
> seen as indicating support for adopting the draft (e.g. silence ==
> acceptance).
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
>