From hrogge@gmail.com Tue Jan 30 00:13:27 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA731C1519A7 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:13:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.108 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dHVG07XXcJ0s for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:13:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34DBC1519A0 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:13:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55ee9805da7so2576518a12.3 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:13:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706602404; x=1707207204; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=p8p2Yb707O3BHG4XIrCF/LL9nnp1Jo22+r7y/zgGtTk=; b=N9ywDkA+Tf6d34njQu/kE2sF/7hn4LCv2S0xEHJ/wtR+4npiWru5jxMuNrPZ038W5F r8XY1DO5lVs3wNhxUhJT/YHWx3HZAqnN07iR5eatg6hkX3lRAu6WKNsgkwHFSaDGHdAA U6K6YA4uf+16AQXFOeYh6X1gkT+da+S+Z/1zLYjQC9OV5CNpiUqp5Mhgh5zWbu56MAa4 rhS5+3YB0QdzkFNSq3CeOe8yVrd6EOq/Jd+tBaUOHKUHiCh9lZ80A5LUe/SAuDH8e4Ls pWTPdtWzXfYkfNwkMIvdGKVzUwFCmN8R45yMzdARA3sPIS4jEIvS5jYrweapxbMlxwGL 9XRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706602404; x=1707207204; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=p8p2Yb707O3BHG4XIrCF/LL9nnp1Jo22+r7y/zgGtTk=; b=lJtPEP1rbTzi3nwpor4h8r4iTljDfZDgJs7g84ruSYvEarXK7vDUTOMkyWr82+w4Af Hb3an9ORxlI1qq5GXKjMgka05qZceoXsajJuXywqY6Q1gGmkpOAIQwm2U85XFFPGVSLy 4Dq19obp9uirgfcdFPBOQTNYOiXp1AVwPI4KNesQpdEHqBFbCAdJMuRFDD4ocwDWK4cF XiKmeHxKz/YQL8fYFKYJ7iXgDajGsgE2OtQDhM4n8HmaiVUahanTx7kWQ1oKRg3FKzAJ jkuGvIvOPJgmKmgtiGMG3ks+LRDSNxeL4OWdbGRcLhdX5GDuUTCOs+G+XqR6qfqUDG3K EmVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzcPw0UR7pHa8vMzq+1oZoO226AA2ecMl/Xzuq23O0Dd5diKmXc OWCEyitiTXH42CBMcKpKL6fUESaAIpfbZFc1i6OMjh7JVCAPUr3ypc+ZQVc2OkAp3Yk5X8HO8qG 6KYlbjVx2RU9lH9+6pL6zpQnw2Srw//K7IbQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHkKPWyUOf91I0IaIcFfzhRk2indYTpa+dZRxjhCgFfvy/MkHLFJYBWWT2Hjqx1TgINE+kQD1nlHBa7o1jnw7M= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:260c:b0:a35:fbc4:4c21 with SMTP id h12-20020a170906260c00b00a35fbc44c21mr1900816ejc.63.1706602403630; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:13:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <34F68A6F-F4A3-4B9C-A4DD-549246154F67@nrl.navy.mil> In-Reply-To: From: Henning Rogge Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:12:57 +0100 Message-ID: To: Abdussalam Baryun Cc: "Adamson, Robert B CIV USN NRL (5522) Washington DC (USA)" , MANET IETF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [manet] SMF in Manet and MPR X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:13:28 -0000 On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:04=E2=80=AFPM Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > I would like if possible an update/information in 2024 about SMF implemen= tation or RFC6621 implementation regarding its use in OLSRv2 RFC7181 SMF is not used in OLSRv2... it's the other way around, the MPR results of OLSRv2 can be used in SMF. > I suggest that the RFC6621 implementation must use PACKET BB (i.e. MANET = Packet) RFC5444 if it is to be used with WG standard routing , because OLSR= v2 RFC7181 is using RFC5444. Or is there other suggestions we can discuss? I suggest you read RFC6621 again... RFC5444 is used for MANET protocols... not for the data plane forwarding. Henning Rogge