RE: [manet] Difference between wireless mesh networks and MANET

"Giorgio Mulas" <giorgio.mulas@cefriel.it> Fri, 29 October 2004 16:29 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA13081 for <manet-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:29:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNZrp-0002ho-KC for manet-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:44:46 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNZEf-0000eP-EM; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:04:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNZ8F-0004VB-3O for manet@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:57:39 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10883 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:57:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from swing.cefriel.it ([131.175.53.9]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNZMX-00022d-3b for manet@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:12:26 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [manet] Difference between wireless mesh networks and MANET
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:57:59 +0200
Message-ID: <9F1223587A755D47805AECAB7ECAF5D901666709@swing.cefriel.it>
Thread-Topic: [manet] Difference between wireless mesh networks and MANET
Thread-Index: AcS9zFvti+DOvI8ySYC2Zbyeq0wPSwAAEwWQ
From: Giorgio Mulas <giorgio.mulas@cefriel.it>
To: Hang Su <shzju@eyou.com>, manet <manet@ietf.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52f7a77164458f8c7b36b66787c853da
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: manet-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: manet-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Hang Su,
Although these two expressions are usually used as synonims I think that there could be a slight difference in the context you are using them. 
I prefer to use the term *ad hoc* when I want to focus on the self-organizing capability of nodes, while I prefer to use the term *mesh* when I want to refer to the type of connections among nodes in the network (that is every node can communicate in a distributed fashion with all the nodes)

Mobility is a particular characteristic of nodes and if you want to highlight this characteristic as critical in the  application you are considering you could use the term MANETs (Mobile Ad hoc NETworks).

This is just my opinion (de gustibus non est disputandum), the important thing IMHO is to agree on a definition (chosen on an ad hoc basis :-) ) if there are different points of view.

Best Regards

Giorgio

	
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .	
	
 	
	
Giorgio Mulas | Researcher	
	
CEFRIEL - Politecnico di Milano
ICT Center of Excellence For Research, Innovation, Education & industrial Labs partnership 
Via Fucini, 2 · 20133 Milano (Italy) 	
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .	
[p. +39 02 23954 265  · f.  +39 02 23954 465 · e. giorgio.mulas@cefriel.it · w. http://www.cefriel.it/~mulas
	


-----Original Message-----
From: manet-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:manet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hang Su
Sent: venerdì 29 ottobre 2004 16.20
To: manet
Subject: [manet] Difference between wireless mesh networks and MANET


Hi all,

Can someone tell the differences between wireless mesh networks and wireless ad hoc networks. Is there any "include" relation between them? In the mesh 
networks, is the mobility of nodes important?

Any suggestion would be appreciate.

Cheers
Hang Su


_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet