[manet] Re: MANET 121 Meeting Agenda

[Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>]

Hi Don,

I suggest that the introduction of notewell and note takers can have less
than 5 minutes, may be 2 minutes.
The wg/draft status and milestones, can have 5 min but should include the
draft of new_charter, which will be discussed in the end of agenda.
In first agenda-manet-00 the new charter had 20 min then became 10 min when
updated, but it is very important so far.

I don't agree on agenda-manet-03, that we have less than 15 min for
face-to-face (f2f) discussing the charter update, also separating issues of
WG new charter from WG milestones is not correct, because making a new
charter is a big milestone. Please note that we did not have enough time at
previous meetings for this discussion about new charter updates.

Therefore,  I suggest we make a f2f side meeting within IETF before our
IETF WG meeting time, as I think was suggested before by our previous WG
AD, and the result of the side meeting to be input and discussed within
this 10 min time slot given in this agenda-manet-03.

If not possible to have a side meeting, then I request that our chair make
it possible as many WGs are doing this f2f side meetings for IETF,

Best Regards,

AB

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 5:36 PM Don Fedyk <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi
>
>
>
> We have posted the Agenda for the MANET Meeting in Dublin.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-121-manet/
>
>
>
> We have DLEP document updates in the works that will be posted to the
> mailing list.
>
>
>
> Updated proposed charted text is also to be posted.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Don, Ronald and Donald
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>