Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents

Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAB61295A1 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:24:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZW3d4iQJPLTQ for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:24:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 047DE129593 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id l66so29944097ioi.1 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:24:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zj/CUi9ag0YkPg49l/uNtyAST6x2J/fFtl4LDdfFg6o=; b=UBqAQKcqCwt2EbplTUZYIBHwf39uUner93js4szYDu9JjhkUdHy7V9H8K+C8v6KZYB vySjohtwYmCHpL8nmfusbyCm1YLbePrDYJ9774mttJe9y9l/xlPZ7eeb3s1I9xyJv/zh gTEVNTaOomfMbEvGtXpNUOF4NZi7MJuqwp1Pu0S0mz9mZuO+AlDxDbeeLQSBvnU+kuQD BqJX0sQr1SBINJyalVBOYrJV+iSP6EIRGXr5le69xcZ4STFPi4QF98CPT3bQtdknvb0Y 5JfRl+5APl+xdZE8kI+Q3Yl0wi94v85c6jK2Jo0jlEE4TjYv+a1pJplFYJJdjRqwk8Fd aAiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zj/CUi9ag0YkPg49l/uNtyAST6x2J/fFtl4LDdfFg6o=; b=HEnPw3s8XpKVznlw6kFtn2i8yRe2YEcN0ZUVrxsjmMDJZ6JM4Kg1t1MQOlWOzj7HI1 pRyglRU/J2rNO3KC2UqMOjMw+Ihhowhr2cVstngZV5v6VkdrUvXWZc5vikggkKrZdT34 +8ATk1OXPLknn3ZmVs83ujlyP8TGNP9NN7OLdZEc2wKQKM1tlS98Jady8om7RQAU0XD0 egurJSTlRe7sQsEXaP8OPV0c6qPD28jxX1lkhECSdKVP6j5ITXQdFKby03ADfhRE3gIm 0GqlcHaZV+mzS4AArWh6FVMH0XIo3grz2mKqvz0UYKRii71zeplHw+LDwklyoS3+9kmj t/Vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mln98+DYC0BMeunpxPu8mPDBWskMpfwuHVRa0YpJ3/QPz9BS17j9FKzN3VJkL38V8pdLRkX77WmNL1Hw==
X-Received: by 10.107.48.199 with SMTP id w190mr5576867iow.117.1486671844928; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:24:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.158.87 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:24:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALtoyokhJPhGdv_-wrGdJsHU=vu75DADU6VjZvV6BZZJtU17Rw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALtoyokY4GE1LHeGjUXmrHT-TF+=t=QcLuzLpcs7pLBm0RDURQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALtoyokhJPhGdv_-wrGdJsHU=vu75DADU6VjZvV6BZZJtU17Rw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:24:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CALtoyomGiojZors291C3xXrKPo5BiMgB-J_MVtei7VRC9XU7NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114451aa373afd05481ec39b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/TBBoWUQsAeCFRUPEWFhSbzICq-Y>
Subject: Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 20:24:07 -0000

WG Participants,

The deadline of Feb 2 having expired, and not hearing any dissent, the
documents above are accepted as working group documents.

Regards,
Stan


On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> WG participants,
>
> Based on earlier complaints, we held off accepting these as WG documents.
> The concerns about the "log jam" of documents appears to be resolved, so
> I'm restarting this request. Please let the chairs know your thoughts on
> acceptance by Feb 2.
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM
> Subject: Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
> To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
>
>
> Hello working group participants,
>
> One of the items identified during the WG meeting in Seoul was to formally
> request, via the list, Working Group adoption of 5 extension drafts related
> to DLEP. This email is that formal request.
>
> The drafts are:
> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-latency-
> extension-00.html
> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-pause-extension-00
> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-multi-
> hop-extension-00
> 4. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-da-
> credit-extension-00
>
> I have put all 4 extensions on this email for expediency only; please do
> not assume that they must be adopted as a group. The chairs would greatly
> appreciate thoughts from the WG, both positive and negative.
>
> For purposes of determining WG consensus, a lack of a response will be
> seen as indicating support for adopting the draft (e.g. silence ==
> acceptance).
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
>
>