Re: [manet] Progress...

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 18 January 2016 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5111B3848 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:19:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Y7dfRH06Ltu for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D81D1B3846 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 11901 invoked by uid 0); 18 Jan 2016 15:19:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2016 15:19:05 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id 7aJz1s0072SSUrH01aK2gB; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:19:03 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=bej4Do/B c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=7aQ_Q-yQQ-AA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=a6pu-KQ2AAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=1TDiGG6opY1MDAPLPnoA:9 a=TD8dDjKZA80wCUXf:21 a=Q_qW-nLow2zxDh3C:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MBrnn_CgAAAA:8 a=N9EpuEYCU7xzpNvfURsA:9 a=CBao_y9ewcbzEBXq:21 a=As7Z82gbZrBzE_xS:21 a=acUogY4-fUCVzr9u:21 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=cxXKDb4fHdQTk48mwnNVFn4pdhpDITqagkegPft0KbU=; b=2PS5bfVBzT6W7ecW5PzCbDTfaKau3TcjdrAb7+JxXIHE/9F6ESxyhtqhnnRPuXpCOvZsmUCbKKNcrqw5L09nFePxG/FM1PNpdvKLQYsKTKNY6QAZymbPoAoYEPTUirR9;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:46097 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1aLBa9-00015v-DB; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 08:19:01 -0700
To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>, Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
References: <CA+-pDCd_+hgQ8Ks+tT5FfCNAwwT-pCVhzC0VZpF8=uLJjkQ3hA@mail.gmail.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D8A6F22EB@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <CA+-pDCcBDp5_UOj5+28SXGPyc_tUc1tqWFgLE32ukU2MUtUSsg@mail.gmail.com> <bfb25ff55acc48e1a24e9f3d106a9bd5@VAUSDITCHM3.idirect.net> <569CFDF7.3020206@labn.net> <CALtoyo=TMmQdxX+maOu62x8M-NbqB8gh-WJ-xcdYJRefyuE+Cg@mail.gmail.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D8A6F34E7@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <569D025F.4060505@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:18:55 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D8A6F34E7@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020404060002020905080309"
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/UUFEC-2FrwIY4LKrDevnU13w6T4>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] Progress...
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:19:09 -0000

agreed.  I should have said "closing out *major* open issues"...

Lou
On 1/18/2016 10:13 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
>
> Perhaps an intermediate (for the list). Major issues each with their
> own thread. For example security, the (still open?) question about
> extensions etc. The minor issues (e.g. introducing a name for a
> variable) collected. If a minor issue blows up into a major one,
> separate it out.
>
>  
>
> *-- *
>
> *Christopher Dearlove
> Senior Principal Engineer
> BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Laboratories
> **__________________________________________________________________________
> *
> *T*:  +44 (0)1245 242194  |  *E: *chris.dearlove@baesystems.com
> <mailto:chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>
>
> BAE Systems Applied Intelligence, Chelmsford Technology Park, Great
> Baddow, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 8HN.
> www.baesystems.com/ai <http://www.baesystems.com/ai>
>
> BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Limited
> Registered in England & Wales No: 01337451
>
> Registered Office: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP
>
>  
>
> *From:*Stan Ratliff [mailto:ratliffstan@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 18 January 2016 15:08
> *To:* Lou Berger
> *Cc:* Ratliff, Stanley; Justin Dean; Dearlove, Christopher (UK);
> manet@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [manet] Progress...
>
>  
>
>  
>
> **** WARNING ****
>
> /This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an
> external partner or the internet.//
> /Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any
> attachments or reply./
> /For information regarding //*/Red Flags/*/that you can look out for
> in emails you receive, click here
> <http://intranet.ent.baesystems.com/howwework/security/spotlights/Documents/Red%20Flags.pdf>.//
> /If you feel the email is suspicious, please follow this process
> <http://intranet.ent.baesystems.com/howwework/security/spotlights/Documents/Dealing%20With%20Suspicious%20Emails.pdf>.//
>
> Lou, 
>
>  
>
>         While admittedly a style preference, I think discussing each topic
>     raised in a separate e-mail thread is a more conducive way of closing
>     out open issues.  This way we can have focused discussions on each
>     topic
>     which hopefully yields in agreed upon text/changes per topic without
>     having to solve / address all issues at once.  Some WGs even use
>     trac to
>     keep track of the open issues/discussion -- this is of course a WG
>     chair
>     / editor choice.
>
>     >From the rest of your message, it sounds like the security
>     considerations section could be topic one if you are amenable...
>
>  
>
> Sorry, I'm shifting over to the Gmail client - it just handles in-line
> edits way better than Outlook, IMO... ;-) 
>
>  
>
> Considering your above comments, I'll go investigate using trac -
> You're right in that it's a style preference, but dealing with
> eleventy-seven different email threads on DLEP over the last two
> versions just made my head hurt. I understand what you're getting at,
> but as verbose as we *all* tend to be, I believe that would cause an
> email storm of biblical proportions... 
>
>  
>
> Regards,
> Stan 
>
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
>