Re: [manet] [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730)
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 10 November 2021 22:14 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244BE3A141F for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:14:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YvxjJLBsiHmc for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936C53A1423 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id f8so16512258edy.4 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8mlnIWsr5DTzyfdeAhx6panMT47zYGthp5Aw/EH5egU=; b=EKGWSAK+iMbHTO8B5P+3E5bGCiAdnx8XqK3t7BsXHIAM+KuD+NfbGYWssJg1Gmbhs9 PmC4d6dmFanfDPEzt5wYnZTjSmjoSO9/hQ/ZWR/YSFP/AOXVOiQpuCWxchSSiLoPc/vo eheyR3sGsRQSjh9lpTK2hWCatTlIFcos/YdJYJYJ1TAZlC6xuugjmNkXbnJyiyrgyZR2 fdF0km2dqK1+S84oNtHpdqvCdwwpV8qYo/xhdIIAFT6Hloi/2pQh6TdfwPlZkQhGroK/ s0fOJLh6cBXh7DRD3zLw9EVbgcb+St3aGC2jXlctEwh596zB2HNfcyLp0B1hgx2/LxL6 SDrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8mlnIWsr5DTzyfdeAhx6panMT47zYGthp5Aw/EH5egU=; b=P8uKzQ2ZhclIQ6RCaO1/BNylPKqyPdWlFIPC7QfxVJjdiv67lEkRm+zzLimoNlDHu0 lin9vNQeNl0mbnw2x2Th3wx8CZS9uMRxqHVTZbgJTmEzXDRXIuGQR/S7iJz3x+J+NSYW gZLk1TIuUr/6TMfAX18l5VquZL5eUSfGWP9CgUCN7zBLR9e/8qrnrIgo5vkCnvIRxiYS qRyvS2omJ84YOCZWutZIFp7ex2lzpxSfVkZ+Si7ERSfWSPYunr+7HX6Pan+uonUlkWan RuDB39MnaVVLlZrBtq0I8a8rl1cGG/HhN0s7WPcKxVJTJQsfCCFBAeUtNQrnbEI0QoD9 OP2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xppM+fyGfOd3Hv5kT2GGuVLsQQBGWd/zXs3YsB4ciqYr2XPCZ U460PHZQsC7cswjrwHUfHSfNyrwHruf3CwuWnijL55Qf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy79bLGd1g6FTa760fn2hOxDAqXv8Yy+f2sBUaM2Lhhk5jIq2tHxC1mr9ZpkSqovYjP/kzytjEdkUs2xYX1UPM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3d01:: with SMTP id gm1mr3073228ejc.219.1636582462961; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:14:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:14:22 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b58d4d4f9014a8398ffd5a93459cdd8@jhuapl.edu>
References: <20211105212513.7995820EA07@rfc-editor.org> <1b58d4d4f9014a8398ffd5a93459cdd8@jhuapl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:14:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESswiOuukHAazL3s7Znm78Y15K-MwGibua_RUitex+FDkyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sipos, Brian J." <brian.sipos@jhuapl.edu>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000059bb8d05d0768cd8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/WR-a_4xd2iD3Cnv471WqaHFUX8M>
Subject: Re: [manet] [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:14:31 -0000
[Cleaned the distribution list a little.] Brian: Hi! Sorry I missed that detail. I was confused by the fact that the same paragraph was edited. Instead of reopening this report, I am going to add a note in 6472 so that the UDP fields are also addressed. Thanks! Alvaro. On November 10, 2021 at 2:58:00 PM, Sipos, Brian J. (brian.sipos@jhuapl.edu) wrote: All, This last errata was about UDP fields, not IP fields that the earlier errata was correcting. They both just happen to apply to the same signal so they edit the same paragraph. Can this item be resurrected? -----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 5:25 PM To: Sipos, Brian J. <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>; sratliff@idirect.net; sjury@cisco.com; dsatterw@broadcom.com; rick.taylor@airbus.com Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com; iesg@ietf.org; manet@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730) APL external email warning: Verify sender wwwrun@rfc-editor.org before clicking links or attachments The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8175, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6730 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Brian Sipos <brian.sipos@jhuapl.edu> Date Reported: 2021-11-03 Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG) Section: 12.4 Original Text ------------- The Peer Offer Signal completes the discovery process; see Section 7.1. Corrected Text -------------- The UDP source port and destination port MUST be set to the UDP destination port and source port, respectively, of the UDP packet containing the associated Peer Discovery Signal. The Peer Offer Signal completes the discovery process; see Section 7.1. Notes ----- The original text did not specify any requirement about the source or destination UDP port number of the Peer Offer signal. --VERIFIER NOTES-- While this is a valid report, it is a duplicate of Errata ID: 6472. I am then marking this one as Rejected. -------------------------------------- RFC8175 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-29) -------------------------------------- Title : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Publication Date : June 2017 Author(s) : S. Ratliff, S. Jury, D. Satterwhite, R. Taylor, B. Berry Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [manet] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730) RFC Errata System
- Re: [manet] [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730) Sipos, Brian J.
- Re: [manet] [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730) Alvaro Retana
- Re: [manet] [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730) Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [manet] [EXT] [Errata Rejected] RFC8175 (6730) Alvaro Retana