Re: [manet] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05: (with COMMENT)

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

I know what you mean about "can't keep away".  :-)
Ok, thanks, both, for the responses.  We'll figure this minor thing out in
the IESG, and no need for you to waste more time thinking about it.

Barry

On Wednesday, May 27, 2015, Thomas Heide Clausen <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Confirm that we just want to "do the right thing" and are taking advice
> from the IESG on what that is. And will implement it.
>
> I am officially on vacation this week - but, as you can see, can't keep
> away from mails. I am fully back in the salt mines come Monday.
>
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> Thomas Heide Clausen
> http://www.thomasclausen.org
>
> "Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for
>   experiments, and they wander off through equation
>   after equation, and eventually  build a structure
>   which has no relation to reality."
>  - Nikola Tesla,
>     Modern Mechanics and Inventions, July, 1934
>
> > On 27 mai 2015, at 12:51, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <
> [e-mail] <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > It's a philosophy question, what does updates mean? Is there a formal
> RFC Editor definition? This does, at the least, update IANA registries
> established by 7181 and I think 7188 and XXXX (draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming
> that we expect to be an RFC before or with this).
> >
> > But honestly, I and co-author don't care one way or the other, if the
> IESG picks an answer, we'll implement it. I will probably have to let my
> co-author handle the mechanics of this, I may be unavailable shortly for at
> least a week.
> >
> > --
> > Christopher Dearlove
> > Senior Principal Engineer
> > BAE Systems Applied Intelligence
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > T:  [phone]  |  E: [e-mail]
> <javascript:;>
> >
> > BAE Systems Applied Intelligence, Chelmsford Technology Park, Great
> Baddow, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 8HN.
> > www.baesystems.com/ai
> > BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Limited
> > Registered in England & Wales No: 01337451
> > Registered Office: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Barry Leiba [mailto:[e-mail] <javascript:;>]
> > Sent: 26 May 2015 18:28
> > To: The IESG
> > Cc: [e-mail] <javascript:;>;
> [e-mail] <javascript:;>;
> [e-mail] <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Barry Leiba's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05: (with COMMENT)
> >
> > ----------------------! WARNING ! ---------------------- This message
> originates from outside our organisation, either from an external partner
> or from the internet.
> > Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any
> attachments or reply.
> > Follow the 'Report Suspicious Emails' link on IT matters for
> instructions on reporting suspicious email messages.
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Let's please have a brief, non-blocking discussion of the "updates"
> > status here.  As I read this, I don't see how this updates either 7181
> or 7188.  It clearly doesn't update 7188: it's just using an extension
> mechanism that was specified in 7188.  I also don't think it updates 7181,
> because it's specifying an optional (indeed, experimental) extension.
> Here: does someone reading 7181, with no interest in implementing this
> experimental extension, need to read (or even know
> > about) this document?  I think the answer is no.
> >
> > (There's also the spurious "XXXX" in the updates list, which should be
> > removed.)
> >
> >
> > ********************************************************************
> > This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> > recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> > recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> > You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> > distribute its contents to any other person.
> > ********************************************************************
>
>