Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents

["Cheng, Bow-Nan - 0665 - MITLL" <[e-mail]>]

No IPR issues on the MITLL side of the house.



--
Bow-Nan Cheng, Ph.D.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Tactical Networks Group
244 Wood St Lexington MA 02420
781-981-4997




On 11/28/16, 1:56 PM, "manet on behalf of Ratliff, Stanley"
<[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:

>Lou, 
>
>Thanks for reminding me on the potential IPR issues. Just to make sure
>that base is completely covered, can I please hear from the other
>co-authors on the extensions as to any IPR claims that might exist?
>
>Regards,
>Stan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: manet [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
>> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 1:17 PM
>> To: Rick Taylor <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
>> 
>> I support adoption (no surprise, I'm a contributor to all).
>> 
>> I'm fine with adopting then doing the changes or doing the restructuring
>> (queue parameters in own doc, merge credit extensions) then adopting -
>>is
>> the chair's call.
>> 
>> Lou
>> 
>> PS I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these documents.
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/28/2016 12:29 PM, Rick Taylor wrote:
>> > Stan, All,
>> >
>> > I seem to remember there was some discussion over whether the
>> > documents should be accepted as WG documents in their current form, or
>> > the contained concepts reformulated into different documents for the
>> WG.
>> >  Where/how that happens is the chairs/authors call.
>> >
>> > There was discussion in Seoul about:
>> >
>> > A) Producing a base document to define 'sub-TLVs' in DLEP for the use
>> > by extensions. (Used by #2 and #4)
>> >
>> > B) Writing a draft describing the use of Flows in DLEP, whether
>> > DiffServ or otherwise differentiated, in a general sense, referring to
>> > the sub-TLVs document.
>> >
>> > C) Perhaps merging some of the good ideas from the #5 and the existing
>> > credit-windowing extension into a single draft, addressing perceived
>> > issues in both.
>> >
>> > D) Extending #1 to cover all the relevant metrics in core DLEP.
>> >
>> > I have already offered to collaborate on A and B.  So I vote for #1,
>> > #2, #3 to be accepted, and #5 merged.
>> >
>> > Contentious maybe...
>> >
>> > Rick
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 10:44 -0500, Stan Ratliff wrote:
>> >> David,
>> >>
>> >> Oops. I claim Monday morning fogginess after the long holiday
>> >> weekend, and being insufficiently caffeinated, as my excuse! ;-)
>> >>
>> >> WG,
>> >> My apologies for the duplication. There are but 4 extensions, but the
>> >> question to the WG is the same: To adopt, or not to adopt?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Stan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL <Davi
>> >> [e-mail]> wrote:
>> >>> Hi Stan,
>> >>>
>> >>> I think #1 and #4 are the same thing, aren't they?
>> >>>
>> >>> David
>> >>>
>> >>> From: manet <[e-mail]> on behalf of Stan Ratliff <rat
>> >>> [e-mail]>
>> >>> Date: Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM
>> >>> To: MANET IETF <[e-mail]>
>> >>> Subject: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello working group participants,
>> >>>
>> >>> One of the items identified during the WG meeting in Seoul was to
>> >>> formally request, via the list, Working Group adoption of 5
>> >>> extension drafts related to DLEP. This email is that formal request.
>> >>>
>> >>> The drafts are:
>> >>> 1.
>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_
>> >>> html_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dlatency-
>> 2Dexten&d=DgICAg&c=LlUvi
>> >>> dvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=6d
>> >>> wQTMiMIWZZcxS2FW_XBJky-J-BfvCBGzn4k8jyFEI&s=ANa8fzRPRpn1KD-
>> IB6msobnd
>> >>> _t8KIKpXDCbWK6zIFtY&e=
>> >>> sion-00.html
>> >>> 2.
>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_
>> >>> html_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dpause-
>> 2Dextensi&d=DgICAg&c=LlUvi
>> >>> dvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=6d
>> >>> wQTMiMIWZZcxS2FW_XBJky-J-
>> BfvCBGzn4k8jyFEI&s=Wv6qbM0mWkXcfS_hVjugB-xs
>> >>> stRUoMW7UbF7s1a2o8w&e=
>> >>> on-00
>> >>> 3.
>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_
>> >>> html_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dmulti-2Dhop-
>> 2Dext&d=DgICAg&c=LlU
>> >>> vidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=
>> >>> 6dwQTMiMIWZZcxS2FW_XBJky-J-
>> BfvCBGzn4k8jyFEI&s=Zqsf8OPHI2iNaHbNzC8GPz
>> >>> tIQGL6o0uEXispDAg400g&e=
>> >>> ension-00
>> >>> 4.
>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_
>> >>> html_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dlatency-
>> 2Dexten&d=DgICAg&c=LlUvi
>> >>> dvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=6d
>> >>> wQTMiMIWZZcxS2FW_XBJky-J-BfvCBGzn4k8jyFEI&s=ANa8fzRPRpn1KD-
>> IB6msobnd
>> >>> _t8KIKpXDCbWK6zIFtY&e=
>> >>> sion-00
>> >>> 5.
>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_
>> >>> html_draft-2Dcheng-2Dmanet-2Ddlep-2Dda-2Dcredit-
>> 2Dext&d=DgICAg&c=LlU
>> >>> vidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=
>> >>> 6dwQTMiMIWZZcxS2FW_XBJky-J-
>> BfvCBGzn4k8jyFEI&s=Pfm1aX9PLkAMWkC1fpHoMH
>> >>> mtldAPycgMVePRoYWBGNI&e=
>> >>> ension-00
>> >>>
>> >>> I have put all 5 extensions on this email for expediency only;
>> >>> please do not assume that they must be adopted as a group. The
>> >>> chairs would greatly appreciate thoughts from the WG, both positive
>> >>> and negative, by December 12.
>> >>>
>> >>> For purposes of determining WG consensus, a lack of a response will
>> >>> be seen as indicating support for adopting the draft (e.g. silence
>> >>> == acceptance).
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Stan
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> manet mailing list
>> >> [e-mail]
>> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mai
>> >> lman_listinfo_manet&d=DgICAg&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-
>> eUsbL
>> >> W5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=6dwQTMiMIWZZcxS2FW_XBJky-J-BfvCBGzn4
>> >> k8jyFEI&s=hr-_ixL6nDbaQUKJS3SWWMc7ZCa0MELuJ87hjJ_Vg2w&e=
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > manet mailing list
>> > [e-mail]
>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mail
>> > man_listinfo_manet&d=DgICAg&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSxQl0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-
>> eUsbLW5
>> > r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-Wbxna8&m=6dwQTMiMIWZZcxS2FW_XBJky-J-
>> BfvCBGzn4k8j
>> > yFEI&s=hr-_ixL6nDbaQUKJS3SWWMc7ZCa0MELuJ87hjJ_Vg2w&e=
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_manet&d=DgICAg&c=LlUvidvlhStGUSx
>> Ql0giOA&r=QzgCKlK-eUsbLW5r8KZAL9L_yqNON1dbKtMa-
>> Wbxna8&m=6dwQTMiMIWZZcxS2FW_XBJky-J-BfvCBGzn4k8jyFEI&s=hr-
>> _ixL6nDbaQUKJS3SWWMc7ZCa0MELuJ87hjJ_Vg2w&e=
>
>==========================================================================
>==================================================================
>This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
>information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
>and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
>or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
>recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
>intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
>in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
>copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
>in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
>
>_______________________________________________
>manet mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>