Re: [manet] AODVv2 responses to recent comments

Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com> Wed, 16 March 2016 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F11D12D584 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zIw7xtd_iDBU for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B43F12D596 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l124so57858481wmf.1 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=zs5+egroBP7kWxfjID9Wha++kNkHXgZQg+K3A8drraA=; b=Lsb/3PgzYfMLjFbasCQf1hJ141FMb6S1UjQWSfHTMxqXt4XKKFpoHwdlOam3QKiT3t pdA8kVC5pIzuaZGasznwmNkbPY2Ap+xrk8LeFpVGkR8b+dxsaa06mY7YFNrswQ1kUIk4 rPMHSs+nUs5fB1vOOQPcIl2CrhIpyfX2w2CHQw5Rz+kcSB7dju4Hw8SJn65bTgoUO6sJ dI5M1NaPMCKulc2/KVJ9qLd4srdSttqopjSX6tWEP4EYbjs6Lz+6kWMhcYtDnWFVksVq juEUsK4xs04vQTybzh/Huk6D2XO7L5UaupTRbksEK/wux+85eXvIFOxvRL5Tx6seWBbg BwqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=zs5+egroBP7kWxfjID9Wha++kNkHXgZQg+K3A8drraA=; b=CLKwzjJNONOexnmb2XcSV6PvSkoYoOVCX7u4NHrEvFJuuEHv5cPqAWfUxoQBhJ6n2k w2M3C+2MQpIXzlGcVS4GBmbfT9ltHtICrBXqqhsV1i5O7YXc03HpAOyebAw80cnwNb06 qxhoupyu7V9cnG7NorNM2w5VsVyXAb/CbcT76EAqw0fc0tIRKqHj4b9J8R0XRHcB7Rgj F/w5AUbYbNF/mBdlevNcWczEi0L7W0StGWPMOHNQ+g6u3Oz3iukCywiC236kk94aYMmu en4I97Enp4oK0C2hqTJuHnMHRshr1+al04n3q3sMI32ZDpDpVJ1Q0vCFRtefTUkk7+ug 2B8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKg5ITwoIB2qzbVnaSC8E3fuDnB4Wp3yy/6GE1AzSNBbFHpVdD9RYDKEl4cTq4LBg==
X-Received: by 10.194.143.82 with SMTP id sc18mr5106536wjb.14.1458150514567; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.7.61.189] (dab-hlw1-h-70-6.dab.02.net. [82.132.234.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y72sm4372361wmh.21.2016.03.16.10.48.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAAePS4DCds3_vqJ8jwymmHWJdH4jXg=ksJ8RO4QqRFL77py7ng@mail.gmail.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D8A6F4A3D@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <56D4EB7D.4010002@earthlink.net> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D8C0227E6@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <944B9E01-74B7-45AD-ACB8-FA79347BC22E@fu-berlin.de> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D9237C4D5@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <462c1514b3c04e83a1b2565f6344626b@VAUSDITCHM2.idirect.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <462c1514b3c04e83a1b2565f6344626b@VAUSDITCHM2.idirect.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-99EC804A-D6F0-46C9-81A9-EA2128657E5A"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A3C07E0F-07A5-4790-AB7C-82D3CC7D6059@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13C75)
From: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:48:30 +0000
To: "Ratliff, Stanley" <sratliff@idirect.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/YqIaMDJ_VDR_icB6dTlBVPte5-E>
Cc: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>, "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>, manet <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] AODVv2 responses to recent comments
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:53:45 -0000

Sorry about that, I assume it was the picture, which I didn't think to remove. But we've all got the picture now. (Actually my work firewall tried blocking it.)

--  
Christopher Dearlove
christopher.dearlove@gmail.com (iPhone)
chris@mnemosyne.demon.co.uk (home)

> On 16 Mar 2016, at 17:38, Ratliff, Stanley <sratliff@idirect.net> wrote:
> 
> Lotte, Christopher,
>  
>  
> I’ve had to approve the last two postings because the email size exceeds the allowed max. Let’s please find a way to limit the email – This is an important discussion, but I’d hate to have to approve each and every response.
>  
> Please?
>  
> Regards,
> Stan
>  
>  
> From: manet [mailto:manet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 1:23 PM
> To: Lotte Steenbrink <lotte.steenbrink@fu-berlin.de>
> Cc: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>; manet <manet@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [manet] AODVv2 responses to recent comments
>  
> I haven’t followed the example (I hope to find time - but that’s true of too many things, with DLEP ahead of AODVv2 on this list).
>  
> But we have a loop, a pretty fundamental problem in a routing algorithm, being discussed by the authors off-list, while in parallel assuring the list that “Other discussion about routing loops has not identified routing loop problems in the existing specification.” (see email chain below).
>  
> I think we have a real problem with what’s wanting to advance to Proposed Standard soon, in terms of process and confidence.
>  
> (I still haven’t managed to even write up comments on the perhaps one third of the draft I have read through yet.)
>  
> --
> 
> Christopher Dearlove
> Senior Principal Engineer
> BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Laboratories
> __________________________________________________________________________
> 
> T:  +44 (0)1245 242194  |  E: chris.dearlove@baesystems.com
> 
> BAE Systems Applied Intelligence, Chelmsford Technology Park, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 8HN.
> www.baesystems.com/ai
> 
> BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Limited
> Registered in England & Wales No: 01337451
> Registered Office: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP
> 
>  
> 
> _____________________________________________________
> This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
> information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
> and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
> recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
> intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
> in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
> copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
> in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
> _____________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet