IETF Logo Mail Archive

[manet] DLEP redundant Destination Ups

"Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL" <David.Wiggins@ll.mit.edu> Fri, 09 August 2019 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=31248f03d9=david.wiggins@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDFB12002F for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdntCev5xxz9 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from llmx2.ll.mit.edu (LLMX2.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED9E5120019 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LLE2K16-MBX03.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K16-MBX03.mitll.ad.local) by llmx2.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTPS id x79IhMOg045582 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 14:43:22 -0400
From: "Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL" <David.Wiggins@ll.mit.edu>
To: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DLEP redundant Destination Ups
Thread-Index: AQHVTuJFidsVE35B90GHgDX2g+eI7Q==
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:43:01 +0000
Message-ID: <E2AD4802-3193-4ACC-B3D9-3162A8EB7CB1@ll.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.25.1.90]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha256"; boundary="B_3648206580_1142812520"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-09_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=908 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908090182
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/Z-iSDAxaGzlPnviqpIfgtTqEyQA>
Subject: [manet] DLEP redundant Destination Ups
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:43:26 -0000

If a modem sends two Destination Ups for the same destination without an intervening Destination Down for that destination, how should the router respond?

 

a) This is a protocol error.  Terminate the session.

b) Ignore the second Destination Up.

c) Treat the second Destination Up as a Destination Update.

d) something else

 

Thanks,

David

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email