Re: [manet] WGLC on three flow control related DLEP Extension I-Ds

That seems fair -- I'll make sure to respond!

On 3/7/2020 9:24 AM, Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't wrote:
>
> Hi Lou,
>
> Our AD has requested me to re-issue these as separate WGLCs for each 
> individual I-D. I will do that later today. (Too much travelling in 
> recent weeks …) I’ll extend the duration: let’s give WG participants 
> two more weeks to respond, right up to the IETF week. It seems to me 
> that it is kind of difficult to do a shepherd’s write-up if nothing 
> can be stated about the level of support from the WG….
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ronald
>
> *From:*Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> *Sent:* zaterdag 7 maart 2020 15:02
> *To:* Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't <Ronald.intVelt@tno.nl>; manet@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [manet] WGLC on three flow control related DLEP 
> Extension I-Ds
>
> Hi Ronald,
>
>     There hasn't been any activity on this threads since it went out.  
> (FWIW I didn't respond as I figured my previous comments applied, 
> perhaps others felt the same.) How do you want to proceed? -- e.g., 
> poke all to get their support / opinions or, as no objections have 
> been received, declare the LC done and publish.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Lou
>
> On 2/11/2020 8:59 AM, Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't wrote:
>
>     Dear MANETeers,
>
>     Apologies for the long silence! Let’s say I just came out of
>     hibernation…
>
>     This message start a renewed* Working Group Last Call on three
>     Working Group documents specifying DLEP extensions related to flow
>     control, all authored by Lou Berger, Bow-Nan Cheng and David Wiggins:
>
>     https://datatracker..ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control>
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension/
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification/
>
>     WGLC for all three Internet-Drafts will end by 29 February (2,5
>     weeks from now). These are fairly short documents (18, 6 and 13
>     pages, respectively, boilerplate included). Please send your
>     comments to the mailing list before that date. If you have read
>     these I-Ds and think they are in good shape, please say so as well.
>
>     *A bit of history: Datatracker tells me that (previous versions
>     of) these drafts had their state changed to ‘In WG Last Call’ by
>     then-co-chair Justin Dean on March 11, 2019. Interestingly, in the
>     mailing list archive I found neither a WGLC announcement around
>     that date nor any subsequent discussion. Lou Berger published
>     updated versions during IETF-106. At the MANET WG session in
>     Singapore, consensus in the room was to have another (short) WGLC.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Ronald in ‘t Velt
>
>     This message may contain information that is not intended for you.
>     If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by
>     mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the
>     message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail,
>     for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind
>     resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission
>     of messages.
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     manet mailing list
>
>     manet@ietf.org  <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>